Literature DB >> 16786886

Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape.

Michaela Loidolt1, Ulrike Aust, Michael Steurer, Nikolaus F Troje, Ludwig Huber.   

Abstract

A go/no-go procedure was used to train pigeons to discriminate pictures of human faces differing only in shape, with either static images or movies of human faces dynamically rotating in depth. On the basis of experimental findings in humans and some earlier studies on three-dimensional object perception in pigeons, we expected dynamic stimulus presentation to support the pigeon's perception of the complex morphology of a human face. However, the performance of the subjects presented with movies was either worse than (AVI format movies) or did not differ from (uncompressed dynamic presentation) that of the subjects trained with a single or with multiple static images of the faces. Furthermore, generalization tests to other presentation conditions and to novel static views revealed no promoting effect of dynamic training. Except for the subjects trained on multiple static views, performance dropped to chance level with views outside the training range. These results are in contrast to some prior reports from the literature, since they suggest that pigeons, unlike humans, have difficulty using the additional structural information provided by the dynamic presentation and integrating the multiple views into a three-dimensional object.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16786886     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  40 in total

1.  Natural categorization through multiple feature learning in pigeons.

Authors:  L Huber; N F Troje; M Loidolt; U Aust; D Grass
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2000-11

2.  Learning an object from multiple views enhances its recognition in an orthogonal rotational axis in pigeons.

Authors:  Jessie J Peissig; Edward A Wasserman; Michael E Young; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Motion as a natural category for pigeons: Generalization and a feature-positive effect.

Authors:  W H Dittrich; S E Lea
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Generalization to novel images in upright and inverted faces.

Authors:  Y Moses; S Ullman; S Edelman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Detection of the velocity of movement of visual stimuli by pigeons?

Authors:  W Hodos; L Smith; J C Bonbright
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Dynamic object perception by pigeons: discrimination of action in video presentations.

Authors:  R G Cook; R Shaw; A P Blaisdell
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.

Authors:  M L Spetch; A Friedman; S L Reid
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-06

8.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Structure from stereo and motion.

Authors:  W Richards
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Rotational invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans.

Authors:  V D Hollard; J D Delius
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  The "lunching" effect: pigeons track motion towards food more than motion away from it.

Authors:  Felipe Cabrera; Federico Sanabria; David Shelley; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Perception of complex motion in humans and pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Jean-François Nankoo; Christopher R Madan; Marcia L Spetch; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.