Literature DB >> 17089589

Dynamic object recognition in pigeons and humans.

Marcia L Spetch1, Alinda Friedman, Quoc C Vuong.   

Abstract

We investigated the role of dynamic information in human and pigeon object recognition. Both species were trained to discriminate between two objects that each had a characteristic motion, so that either cue could be used to perform the task successfully. The objects were either easy or difficult to decompose into parts. At test, the learned objects could appear in their learned motions, the reverse of the learned motions, or an entirely new motion, or a new object could appear in one of the learned motions. For humans, any change in the learned motion produced a decrement in performance for both the decomposable and the nondecomposable objects, but participants did not respond differentially to new objects that appeared in the learned motions. Pigeons showed the same pattern of responding as did humans for the decomposable objects, except that pigeons responded differentially to new objects in the learned motions. For the nondecomposable objects, pigeons used motion cues exclusively. We suggest that for some types of objects, dynamic information may be weighted differently by pigeons and humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17089589     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  28 in total

1.  Perception of coherent motion in random dot displays by pigeons and humans.

Authors:  W F Bischof; S L Reid; D R Wylie; M L Spetch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

2.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites.

Authors:  P Cavanagh; A T Labianca; I M Thornton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-06

3.  Learning an object from multiple views enhances its recognition in an orthogonal rotational axis in pigeons.

Authors:  Jessie J Peissig; Edward A Wasserman; Michael E Young; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity.

Authors:  Barbara Knappmeyer; Ian M Thornton; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The role of characteristic motion in object categorization.

Authors:  Fiona N Newell; Christian Wallraven; Susanne Huber
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-03-08       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition.

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; S Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

8.  Dynamic object perception by pigeons: discrimination of action in video presentations.

Authors:  R G Cook; R Shaw; A P Blaisdell
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.

Authors:  M L Spetch; A Friedman; S L Reid
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-06

10.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sensitivity of the avian motion system to light and dark stimuli.

Authors:  Jean-François Nankoo; Christopher R Madan; Marcia L Spetch; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learned Non-Rigid Object Motion is a View-Invariant Cue to Recognizing Novel Objects.

Authors:  Lewis L Chuang; Quoc C Vuong; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.380

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.