Literature DB >> 16933802

Family resemblances facilitate formation and expansion of functional equivalence classes in pigeons.

Masako Jitsumori1, Naoki Shimada, Sana Inoue.   

Abstract

Four pigeons were given repeated reversal training and testing with photographs of human faces constituting two categories structured by family resemblances, each consisting of a prototype, good exemplars, and poor exemplars. Each of the good exemplars (AM, BM, and CM) was created by 50% morphing of the prototype (M) and one of the poor exemplars (A, B, and C, respectively) and thus was physically similar to the prototype and to the corresponding poor exemplar. The pigeons were first trained and tested for the formation of two (AM, BM, and CM) classes. Then, the stimulus sets were extended to include (1) M and the poor exemplars that were not physically similar to one another and (2) 50% morphs of the poor exemplars (AB, BC, and CA). In the sequentially introduced training and test phases, we successfully tracked expansion of the functional equivalence classes consisting of exemplars that had little similarity but could be linked together through other members of the class.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16933802     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  12 in total

1.  Natural categorization through multiple feature learning in pigeons.

Authors:  L Huber; N F Troje; M Loidolt; U Aust; D Grass
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2000-11

2.  Superordinate category formation in pigeons: association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent.

Authors:  S L Astley; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-10

3.  Categorical learning in pigeons: the role of texture and shape in complex static stimuli.

Authors:  N F Troje; L Huber; M Loidolt; U Aust; M Fieder
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The formation of a generalized categorization repertoire: effect of training with multiple domains, samples, and comparisons.

Authors:  Lanny Fields; Kenneth F Reeve; Priya Matneja; Antonios Varelas; James Belanich; Adrienne Fitzer; Kim Shamoun
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Categorization, concept learning, and behavior analysis: an introduction.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Mark Galizio; Thomas S Critchfied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Levels of stimulus control: a functional approach.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1990-11

7.  Secondary generalization and categorization in pigeons.

Authors:  R S Bhatt; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Functional classes and equivalence relations.

Authors:  M Sidman; C K Wynne; R W Maguire; T Barnes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm.

Authors:  M Sidman; W Tailby
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Associative concept learning in animals.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Edward A Wasserman; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The learning of basic-level categories by pigeons: the prototype effect, attention, and effects of categorization.

Authors:  Masako Jitsumori; Midori Ohkita; Tomokazu Ushitani
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.986

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.