Literature DB >> 11131790

Natural categorization through multiple feature learning in pigeons.

L Huber1, N F Troje, M Loidolt, U Aust, D Grass.   

Abstract

Recently (Troje, Huber, Loidolt, Aust, & Fieder 1999), we found that pigeons discriminated between large sets of photorealistic frontal images of human faces on the basis of sex. This ability was predominantly based on information contained in the visual texture of those images rather than in their configural properties. The pigeons could learn the distinction even when differences of shape and average intensity were completely removed. Here, we proved more specifically the pigeons' flexibility and efficiency to utilize the class-distinguishing information contained in complex natural classes. First, we used principal component as well as discriminant function analysis in order to determine which aspects of the male and female images could support successful categorization. We then conducted various tests involving systematic transformations and reduction of the feature content to examine whether or not the pigeons' categorization behaviour comes under the control of category-level feature dimensions--that is, those stimulus aspects that most accurately divide the stimulus classes into the experimenter-defined categories of "Male" and "Female". Enhanced classification ability in the presence of impoverished test faces that varied only along one of the first three principal components provided evidence that the pigeons used these class-distinguishing stimulus aspects as a basis for generalization to new instances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11131790     DOI: 10.1080/713932733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  15 in total

1.  Recognition of static and dynamic images of depth-rotated human faces by pigeons.

Authors:  Masako Jitsumori; Hiroshi Makino
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Novelty, stimulus control, and operant variability.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Philip N Chase
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2002

3.  Family resemblances facilitate formation and expansion of functional equivalence classes in pigeons.

Authors:  Masako Jitsumori; Naoki Shimada; Sana Inoue
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape.

Authors:  Michaela Loidolt; Ulrike Aust; Michael Steurer; Nikolaus F Troje; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 5.  The neuroscience of perceptual categorization in pigeons: A mechanistic hypothesis.

Authors:  Onur Güntürkün; Charlotte Koenen; Fabrizio Iovine; Alexis Garland; Roland Pusch
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Visual artificial grammar learning: comparative research on humans, kea (Nestor notabilis) and pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Nina Stobbe; Gesche Westphal-Fitch; Ulrike Aust; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Domestic pigeons (Columba livia) discriminate between photographs of male and female pigeons.

Authors:  Tamo Nakamura; Masato Ito; David B Croft; R Frederick Westbrook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Target-defining features in a "people-present/people-absent" discrimination task by pigeons.

Authors:  Ulrike Aust; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-05

9.  Domestic pigeons (Columba livia) discriminate between photographs of individual pigeons.

Authors:  Tamo Nakamura; David B Croft; R Frederick Westbrook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Psychological factors affecting equine performance.

Authors:  Sebastian D McBride; Daniel S Mills
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.