Literature DB >> 15277482

Using unsupervised learning with variational bayesian mixture of factor analysis to identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects.

Pamela A Sample1, Kwokleung Chan, Catherine Boden, Te-Won Lee, Eytan Z Blumenthal, Robert N Weinreb, Antje Bernd, John Pascual, Jiucang Hao, Terrence Sejnowski, Michael H Goldbaum.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether an unsupervised machine learning classifier can identify patterns of visual field loss in standard visual fields consistent with typical patterns learned by decades of human experience.
METHODS: Standard perimetry thresholds for 52 locations plus age from one eye of each of 156 patients with glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) and 189 eyes of healthy subjects were clustered with an unsupervised machine classifier, variational Bayesian mixture of factor analysis (vbMFA).
RESULTS: The vbMFA formed five distinct clusters. Cluster 5 held 186 of 189 fields from normal eyes plus 46 from eyes with GON. These fields were then judged within normal limits by several traditional methods. Each of the other four clusters could be described by the pattern of loss found within it. Cluster 1 (71 GON + 3 normal optic discs) included early, localized defects. A purely diffuse component was rare. Cluster 2 (26 GON) exhibited primarily deep superior hemifield defects, and cluster 3 (10 GON) held deep inferior hemifield defects only or in combination with lesser superior field defects. Cluster 4 (6 GON) showed deep defects in both hemifields. In other words, visual fields within a given cluster had similar patterns of loss that differed from the predominant pattern found in other clusters. The classifier separated the data based solely on the patterns of loss within the fields, without being guided by the diagnosis, placing 98.4% of the healthy eyes within the same cluster and spreading 70.5% of the eyes with GON across the other four clusters, in good agreement with a glaucoma expert and pattern standard deviation.
CONCLUSIONS: Without training-based diagnosis (unsupervised learning), the vbMFA identified four important patterns of field loss in eyes with GON in a manner consistent with years of clinical experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15277482      PMCID: PMC2927843          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  30 in total

1.  Lack of diffuse loss of differential light sensitivity in early glaucoma.

Authors:  A Heijl
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1989-08

2.  Visual field defects in early open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  M F Armaly
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1971

3.  The early field defects in glaucoma.

Authors:  S M Drance
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1969-02

4.  The frequency distribution of earliest glaucomatous visual field defects documented by automatic perimetry.

Authors:  A Heijl; L Lundqvist
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1984-08

5.  Visual field damage in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; S M Drance; G R Douglas; C A Johnson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Early foveal involvement and generalized depression of the visual field in glaucoma.

Authors:  J L Anctil; D R Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-03

7.  The onset and evolution of glaucomatous visual field defects.

Authors:  W M Hart; B Becker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  The structure-function relationship in eyes with glaucomatous visual field loss that crosses the horizontal meridian.

Authors:  Catherine Boden; Pamela A Sample; Andreas G Boehm; Christiana Vasile; Radha Akinepalli; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-07

9.  Patterns of early visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  J Caprioli; M Sears; J M Miller
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  The disc and the field in glaucoma.

Authors:  S M Drance
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  16 in total

1.  Spatial pattern of glaucomatous visual field loss obtained with regionally condensed stimulus arrangements.

Authors:  Ulrich Schiefer; Eleni Papageorgiou; Pamela A Sample; John P Pascual; Bettina Selig; Elke Krapp; Jens Paetzold
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Using unsupervised learning with independent component analysis to identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects.

Authors:  Michael H Goldbaum; Pamela A Sample; Zuohua Zhang; Kwokleung Chan; Jiucang Hao; Te-Won Lee; Catherine Boden; Christopher Bowd; Rupert Bourne; Linda Zangwill; Terrence Sejnowski; David Spinak; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Unsupervised learning with independent component analysis can identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects.

Authors:  Michael Henry Goldbaum
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2005

4.  Learning from data: recognizing glaucomatous defect patterns and detecting progression from visual field measurements.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Recognizing patterns of visual field loss using unsupervised machine learning.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Michael H Goldbaum; Linda M Zangwill; Felipe A Medeiros; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-21

6.  Patterns of functional vision loss in glaucoma determined with archetypal analysis.

Authors:  Tobias Elze; Louis R Pasquale; Lucy Q Shen; Teresa C Chen; Janey L Wiggs; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Patterns of glaucomatous visual field loss in sita fields automatically identified using independent component analysis.

Authors:  Michael H Goldbaum; Gil-Jin Jang; Chris Bowd; Jiucang Hao; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey Liebmann; Christopher Girkin; Tzyy-Ping Jung; Robert N Weinreb; Pamela A Sample
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2009-12

8.  Combining functional and structural tests improves the diagnostic accuracy of relevance vector machine classifiers.

Authors:  Lyne Racette; Christine Y Chiou; Jiucang Hao; Christopher Bowd; Michael H Goldbaum; Linda M Zangwill; Te-Won Lee; Robert N Weinreb; Pamela A Sample
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Assessing visual field clustering schemes using machine learning classifiers in standard perimetry.

Authors:  Catherine Boden; Kwokleung Chan; Pamela A Sample; Jiucang Hao; Te-Wan Lee; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Michael H Goldbaum
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Pattern recognition can detect subtle field defects in eyes of HIV individuals without retinitis under HAART.

Authors:  Michael H Goldbaum; Igor Kozak; Jiucang Hao; Pamela A Sample; TeWon Lee; Igor Grant; William R Freeman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.