Literature DB >> 24710816

Learning from data: recognizing glaucomatous defect patterns and detecting progression from visual field measurements.

Siamak Yousefi, Michael H Goldbaum, Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian, Felipe A Medeiros, Linda M Zangwill, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Christopher A Girkin, Robert N Weinreb, Christopher Bowd.   

Abstract

A hierarchical approach to learn from visual field data was adopted to identify glaucomatous visual field defect patterns and to detect glaucomatous progression. The analysis pipeline included three stages, namely, clustering, glaucoma boundary limit detection, and glaucoma progression detection testing. First, cross-sectional visual field tests collected from each subject were clustered using a mixture of Gaussians and model parameters were estimated using expectation maximization. The visual field clusters were further estimated to recognize glaucomatous visual field defect patterns by decomposing each cluster into several axes. The glaucoma visual field defect patterns along each axis then were identified. To derive a definition of progression, the longitudinal visual fields of stable glaucoma eyes on the abnormal cluster axes were projected and the slope was approximated using linear regression (LR) to determine the confidence limit of each axis. For glaucoma progression detection, the longitudinal visual fields of each eye on the abnormal cluster axes were projected and the slope was approximated by LR. Progression was assigned if the progression rate was greater than the boundary limit of the stable eyes; otherwise, stability was assumed. The proposed method was compared to a recently developed progression detection method and to clinically available glaucoma progression detection software. The clinical accuracy of the proposed pipeline was as good as or better than the currently available methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24710816      PMCID: PMC4254715          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2314714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  37 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective.

Authors:  I Kononenko
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  Ensemble learning with active example selection for imbalanced biomedical data classification.

Authors:  Sangyoon Oh; Min Su Lee; Byoung-Tak Zhang
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Unsupervised learning with independent component analysis can identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects.

Authors:  Michael Henry Goldbaum
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2005

4.  Complementary ensemble clustering of biomedical data.

Authors:  Samah Jamal Fodeh; Cynthia Brandt; Thai Binh Luong; Ali Haddad; Martin Schultz; Terrence Murphy; Michael Krauthammer
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  The early field defects in glaucoma.

Authors:  S M Drance
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1969-02

Review 6.  Pattern of visual field defects in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  M Araie
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Use of progressive glaucomatous optic disk change as the reference standard for evaluation of diagnostic tests in glaucoma.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020.

Authors:  H A Quigley; A T Broman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network.

Authors:  M H Goldbaum; P A Sample; H White; B Côlt; P Raphaelian; R D Fechtner; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Using unsupervised learning with variational bayesian mixture of factor analysis to identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects.

Authors:  Pamela A Sample; Kwokleung Chan; Catherine Boden; Te-Won Lee; Eytan Z Blumenthal; Robert N Weinreb; Antje Bernd; John Pascual; Jiucang Hao; Terrence Sejnowski; Michael H Goldbaum
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  16 in total

1.  Dynamic Monitoring and Control of Irreversible Chronic Diseases with Application to Glaucoma.

Authors:  Pooyan Kazemian; Jonathan E Helm; Mariel S Lavieri; Joshua D Stein; Mark P Van Oyen
Journal:  Prod Oper Manag       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 2.  Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.

Authors:  Rongrong Hu; Lyne Racette; Kelly S Chen; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  An enhanced deep image model for glaucoma diagnosis using feature-based detection in retinal fundus.

Authors:  Law Kumar Singh; Hitendra Garg; Munish Khanna; Robin Singh Bhadoria
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Monitoring Glaucomatous Functional Loss Using an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Dashboard.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Tobias Elze; Louis R Pasquale; Osamah Saeedi; Mengyu Wang; Lucy Q Shen; Sarah R Wellik; Carlos G De Moraes; Jonathan S Myers; Michael V Boland
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  An Objective and Easy-to-Use Glaucoma Functional Severity Staging System Based on Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Huang; Fatemeh Saki; Mengyu Wang; Tobias Elze; Michael V Boland; Louis R Pasquale; Chris A Johnson; Siamak Yousefi
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.290

6.  Detecting glaucomatous change in visual fields: Analysis with an optimization framework.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Michael H Goldbaum; Ehsan S Varnousfaderani; Akram Belghith; Tzyy-Ping Jung; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Association between visual field damage and corneal structural parameters.

Authors:  Alexandru Lavric; Valentin Popa; Hidenori Takahashi; Rossen M Hazarbassanov; Siamak Yousefi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prediction of Visual Field Progression from OCT Structural Measures in Moderate to Advanced Glaucoma.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Alessandro Rabiolo; Kiumars Edalati; Joseph Caprioli; Siamak Yousefi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 5.488

9.  Convex Representations Using Deep Archetypal Analysis for Predicting Glaucoma.

Authors:  Anshul Thakur; Michael Goldbaum; Siamak Yousefi
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2020-05-28

10.  Unsupervised Gaussian Mixture-Model With Expectation Maximization for Detecting Glaucomatous Progression in Standard Automated Perimetry Visual Fields.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Michael H Goldbaum; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.