PURPOSE: To investigate whether combining optic disc topography and short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) data improves the diagnostic accuracy of relevance vector machine (RVM) classifiers for detecting glaucomatous eyes compared with using each test alone. METHODS: One eye of 144 glaucoma patients and 68 healthy controls from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study were included. RVM were trained and tested with cross-validation on optimized (backward elimination) SWAP features (thresholds plus age; pattern deviation; and total deviation) and on Heidelberg retina tomograph II (HRT) optic disc topography features, independently and in combination. RVM performance was also compared with 2 HRT linear discriminant functions and to SWAP mean deviation and pattern standard deviation. Classifier performance was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) generated for each feature set and by the sensitivities at set specificities of 75%, 90%, and 96%. RESULTS: RVM trained on combined HRT and SWAP thresholds plus age had significantly higher AUROC (0.93) than RVM trained on HRT (0.88) and SWAP (0.76) alone. AUROCs for the SWAP global indices (mean deviation: 0.68; pattern standard deviation: 0.72) offered no advantage over SWAP thresholds plus age, whereas the linear discriminant functions AUROCs were significantly lower than RVM trained on the combined SWAP and HRT feature set and on HRT alone feature set. CONCLUSIONS: Training RVM on combined optimized HRT and SWAP data improved diagnostic accuracy compared with training on SWAP and HRT parameters alone. Future research may identify other combinations of tests and classifiers that can also improve diagnostic accuracy.
PURPOSE: To investigate whether combining optic disc topography and short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) data improves the diagnostic accuracy of relevance vector machine (RVM) classifiers for detecting glaucomatous eyes compared with using each test alone. METHODS: One eye of 144 glaucomapatients and 68 healthy controls from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study were included. RVM were trained and tested with cross-validation on optimized (backward elimination) SWAP features (thresholds plus age; pattern deviation; and total deviation) and on Heidelberg retina tomograph II (HRT) optic disc topography features, independently and in combination. RVM performance was also compared with 2 HRT linear discriminant functions and to SWAP mean deviation and pattern standard deviation. Classifier performance was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) generated for each feature set and by the sensitivities at set specificities of 75%, 90%, and 96%. RESULTS: RVM trained on combined HRT and SWAP thresholds plus age had significantly higher AUROC (0.93) than RVM trained on HRT (0.88) and SWAP (0.76) alone. AUROCs for the SWAP global indices (mean deviation: 0.68; pattern standard deviation: 0.72) offered no advantage over SWAP thresholds plus age, whereas the linear discriminant functions AUROCs were significantly lower than RVM trained on the combined SWAP and HRT feature set and on HRT alone feature set. CONCLUSIONS: Training RVM on combined optimized HRT and SWAP data improved diagnostic accuracy compared with training on SWAP and HRT parameters alone. Future research may identify other combinations of tests and classifiers that can also improve diagnostic accuracy.
Authors: Felipe A Medeiros; Diana Ng; Linda M Zangwill; Pamela A Sample; Christopher Bowd; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Bryce A Ford; Paul H Artes; Terry A McCormick; Marcelo T Nicolela; Raymond P LeBlanc; Balwantray C Chauhan Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Lyne Racette; Felipe A Medeiros; Christopher Bowd; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Pamela A Sample Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Linda M Zangwill; Kwokleung Chan; Christopher Bowd; Jicuang Hao; Te-Won Lee; Robert N Weinreb; Terrence J Sejnowski; Michael H Goldbaum Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Pamela A Sample; Kwokleung Chan; Catherine Boden; Te-Won Lee; Eytan Z Blumenthal; Robert N Weinreb; Antje Bernd; John Pascual; Jiucang Hao; Terrence Sejnowski; Michael H Goldbaum Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Siamak Yousefi; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Tzyy-Ping Jung; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Christopher Bowd Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Christopher Bowd; Intae Lee; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ali S Raza; Xian Zhang; Carlos G V De Moraes; Charles A Reisman; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Zhiyong Yang; Andrew J Tatham; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Chunwei Zhang; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Zhiyong Yang; Andrew J Tatham; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros; Ting Liu; Linda M Zangwill Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christopher Bowd; Robert N Weinreb; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Intae Lee; Giljin Jang; Siamak Yousefi; Linda M Zangwill; Felipe A Medeiros; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Michael H Goldbaum Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 3.240