Literature DB >> 15255520

A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics.

Sankararaman Suryanarayanan1, Andrew Karellas, Srinivasan Vedantham, Sandra M Waldrop, Carl J D'Orsi.   

Abstract

In this investigation the effect of JPEG 2000 compression on the contrast-detail (CD) characteristics of digital mammography images was studied using an alternative forced choice (AFC) technique. Images of a contrast-detail phantom, acquired using a clinical full-field digital mammography system, were compressed using a commercially available software product (JPEG 2000). Data compression was achieved at ratios of 1:1, 10:1, 20:1, and 30:1 and the images were reviewed by seven observers on a high-resolution display. Psychophysical detection characteristics were first computed by fitting perception data using a maximum-likelihood technique from which CD curves were derived at 50%, 62.5%, and 75% threshold levels. Statistical analysis indicated no significant difference in the perception of mean disk thickness up to 20:1 compression except for disk diameter of 1 mm. All other compression combinations exhibited significant degradation in CD characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15255520      PMCID: PMC3043965          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-003-1728-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  22 in total

1.  Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Hetal Ved; Stephen P Baker; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The value of scatter removal by a grid in full field digital mammography.

Authors:  Wouter J H Veldkamp; Martin A O Thijssen; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Clinical evaluation of compression ratios using JPEG2000 on computed radiography chest images.

Authors:  Min-Mo Sung; Hee-Joung Kim; Sun Kook Yoo; Byoung-Wook Choi; Ji-Eun Nam; Hye-Sung Kim; Jae-Hoon Lee; Hyung-Sik Yoo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  An introduction to wavelet theory and application for the radiological physicist.

Authors:  M D Harpen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems.

Authors:  J Wang; S Langer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Image compression in digital mammography: effects on computerized detection of subtle microcalcifications.

Authors:  H P Chan; S C Lo; L T Niklason; D M Ikeda; K L Lam
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Contrast-detail detectability analysis: comparison of a digital spot mammography system and an analog screen-film mammography system.

Authors:  H Liu; L L Fajardo; J R Barrett; R A Baxter
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography.

Authors:  R Aufrichtig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Clinical evaluation of irreversible data compression for computed radiography of the chest.

Authors:  K Egashira; H Nakata; H Watanabe; K Uchida; K Nakamura; Y Ishino; K Horino; R Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  4 in total

1.  A blurring index for medical images.

Authors:  Tzong-Jer Chen; Keh-Shih Chuang; Jen-Hao Chang; Ya-Hui Shiao; Chun-Chao Chuang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography.

Authors:  Kalpana M Kanal; Elizabeth Krupinski; Eric A Berns; William R Geiser; Andrew Karellas; Martha B Mainiero; Melissa C Martin; Samir B Patel; Daniel L Rubin; Jon D Shepard; Eliot L Siegel; Judith A Wolfman; Tariq A Mian; Mary C Mahoney
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Quantitative visually lossless compression ratio determination of JPEG2000 in digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Verislav T Georgiev; Anna N Karahaliou; Spyros G Skiadopoulos; Nikos S Arikidis; Alexandra D Kazantzi; George S Panayiotakis; Lena I Costaridou
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  X-ray phase contrast imaging of the breast: analysis of tissue simulating materials.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.