Literature DB >> 12906188

The value of scatter removal by a grid in full field digital mammography.

Wouter J H Veldkamp1, Martin A O Thijssen, Nico Karssemeijer.   

Abstract

Our objective in this study was to investigate the usefulness of an anti-scatter grid in digital mammography using a contrast detail phantom. The mammography system we investigated was a GE Senographe 2000D. We carried out phantom measurements under various conditions with and without using the anti-scatter grid. A new version of the CDMAM phantom (version 3.4) was used. This phantom consists of a matrix of square cells with disks of varying size and contrast. For given exposure conditions detectability of these disks can be determined and used for construction of contrast detail curves. Previously, a computer program was developed at our institute that performs a fully automatic analysis of the phantom recordings using the ideal observer model. Breast thickness was simulated by a homogeneous layer of PMMA in the range of 1 to 7 cm. Series of images were recorded for different KeV and target-filter combinations depending on the simulated thickness. The dose was kept constant for each thickness with and without using a grid. It appeared that image quality improved for simulated breast thickness below 5 cm when the grid was removed. In the range from 5 to 7 cm contrast detail curves obtained with or without a grid were similar. Results suggest that for compressed breast thickness in the range of 1 to 7 cm a grid might not be needed in the digital mammography system we investigated. Below 5 cm, omitting the grid may allow lower dose to the patient without losing image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12906188     DOI: 10.1118/1.1584044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Sandra M Waldrop; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.

Authors:  Wouter J H Veldkamp; Lucia J M Kroft; Mireille V Boot; Bart J A Mertens; Jacob Geleijns
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography: effect of pixel size.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  On image quality metrics and the usefulness of grids in digital mammography.

Authors:  Han Chen; Mats Danielsson; Cheng Xu; Björn Cederström
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-02-17

5.  A new stationary gridline artifact suppression method based on the 2D discrete wavelet transform.

Authors:  Hui Tang; Dan Tong; Xu Dong Bao; Jean-Louis Dillenseger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Hinton; Lin Ma; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Serghei Malkov; Bo Fan; Heather Greenwood; Bonnie Joe; Vivian Lee; Fredrik Strand; Karla Kerlikowske; John Shepherd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Antiscatter grid use in pediatric digital tomosynthesis imaging.

Authors:  Jenna M King; Idris A Elbakri; Martin Reed
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Comparing dual energy CT and subtraction CT on a phantom: which one provides the best contrast in iodine maps for sub-centimetre details?

Authors:  Evelinda Baerends; Luuk J Oostveen; Casper T Smit; Marco Das; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Monique Brink; Frank de Lange; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Effect of anode/filter combination on average glandular dose in mammography.

Authors:  Michał Biegała; Teresa Jakubowska; Karolina Markowska
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.