Literature DB >> 23065144

Quantitative visually lossless compression ratio determination of JPEG2000 in digitized mammograms.

Verislav T Georgiev1, Anna N Karahaliou, Spyros G Skiadopoulos, Nikos S Arikidis, Alexandra D Kazantzi, George S Panayiotakis, Lena I Costaridou.   

Abstract

The current study presents a quantitative approach towards visually lossless compression ratio (CR) threshold determination of JPEG2000 in digitized mammograms. This is achieved by identifying quantitative image quality metrics that reflect radiologists' visual perception in distinguishing between original and wavelet-compressed mammographic regions of interest containing microcalcification clusters (MCs) and normal parenchyma, originating from 68 images from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography. Specifically, image quality of wavelet-compressed mammograms (CRs, 10:1, 25:1, 40:1, 70:1, 100:1) is evaluated quantitatively by means of eight image quality metrics of different computational principles and qualitatively by three radiologists employing a five-point rating scale. The accuracy of the objective metrics is investigated in terms of (1) their correlation (r) with qualitative assessment and (2) ROC analysis (A z index), employing pooled radiologists' rating scores as ground truth. The quantitative metrics mean square error, mean absolute error, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and structural similarity demonstrated strong correlation with pooled radiologists' ratings (r, 0.825, 0.823, -0.825, and -0.826, respectively) and the highest area under ROC curve (A z , 0.922, 0.920, 0.922, and 0.922, respectively). For each quantitative metric, the highest accuracy values of corresponding ROC curves were used to define metric cut-off values. The metrics cut-off values were subsequently used to suggest a visually lossless CR threshold, estimated to be between 25:1 and 40:1 for the dataset analyzed. Results indicate the potential of the quantitative metrics approach in predicting visually lossless CRs in case of MCs in mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23065144      PMCID: PMC3649057          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9538-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  22 in total

1.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.

Authors:  Zhou Wang; Alan Conrad Bovik; Hamid Rahim Sheikh; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.856

2.  A comparison of three image fidelity metrics of different computational principles for JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images.

Authors:  Kil Joong Kim; Bohyoung Kim; Rafal Mantiuk; Thomas Richter; Hyunna Lee; Heung-Sik Kang; Jinwook Seo; Kyoung Ho Lee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics.

Authors:  Bohyoung Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee; Kil Joong Kim; Rafal Mantiuk; Seokyung Hahn; Tae Jung Kim; Young Hoon Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis: basic principles and applications in radiology.

Authors:  A R van Erkel; P M Pattynama
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Mónica Penedo; Miguel Souto; Pablo G Tahoces; José M Carreira; Justo Villalón; Gerardo Porto; Carmen Seoane; Juan J Vidal; Kevin S Berbaum; Dev P Chakraborty; Laurie L Fajardo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Breast Cancer Screening: Is It Worthwhile?

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  Detection of simulated lesions on data-compressed digital mammograms.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Sandra M Waldrop; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-06-27       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Anna Margolis; Li Lan; Michael R Chinander
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Usability of irreversible image compression in radiological imaging. A position paper by the European Society of Radiology (ESR).

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.