Literature DB >> 9399169

A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems.

J Wang1, S Langer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to further inform radiologists, physicists, technologists, and engineers working with digital image display devices of issues related to human perception. This article will briefly review the effects of several factors in human perception that are specifically relevant to a digital display environment. These factors include the following: the spatial and contrast resolution of the display device; background luminance level and luminance range of the display system; brightness uniformity; extraneous light in the reading room; displayed field size; viewing distance; image motion and monitor flickering; signal to noise ratio of the displayed image; magnification functions; and the user interface. After reviewing the perception study results, a checklist of desirable features and quality assurance issues for a digital display workstation are presented as an appendix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9399169      PMCID: PMC3452987          DOI: 10.1007/bf03168838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  14 in total

1.  Study of visual acuity during the ocular pursuit of moving test objects. I. Introduction.

Authors:  E LUDVIGH; J W MILLER
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1958-11

2.  Some observations and theory on the variation of visual acuity with the orientation of the test object.

Authors:  H LEIBOWITZ
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1953-10

3.  Performance tests and quality control of cathode ray tube displays.

Authors:  H Roehrig; H Blume; T L Ji; M Browne
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Electronic imaging workstations: ergonomic issues and the user interface.

Authors:  S C Horii
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Performance characteristics and image fidelity of gray-scale monitors.

Authors:  S J Dwyer; B K Stewart; J W Sayre; D R Aberle; M I Boechat; J C Honeyman; J M Boehme; H Roehrig; T L Ji; G J Blaine
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography.

Authors:  C Kimme-Smith; A G Haus; N DeBruhl; L W Bassett
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Resolution and contrast sensitivity at low luminances.

Authors:  A van Meeteren; J J Vos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings.

Authors:  F W Campbell; J J Kulikowski; J Levinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Spatial resolution by the human visual system. The effect of mean retinal illuminance.

Authors:  A S Patel
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1966-05

10.  Effect of ambient light on electronically displayed medical images as measured by luminance-discrimination thresholds.

Authors:  D C Rogers; R E Johnston; S M Pizer
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  12 in total

1.  Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devices.

Authors:  J Wang; J Anderson; T Lane; C Stetson; J Moore
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study.

Authors:  Jihong Wang; Ken Compton; Qi Peng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Sandra M Waldrop; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  X ray imaging goes digital.

Authors:  Kwan-Hoong Ng; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-10-14

5.  Verification of DICOM GSDF in complex backgrounds.

Authors:  David L Leong; Louise Rainford; Tamara Miner Haygood; Gary J Whitman; Philip M Tchou; William R Geiser; Selin Carkaci; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography: effect of pixel size.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Contrast sensitivity of digital imaging display systems: contrast threshold dependency on object type and implications for monitor quality assurance and quality control in PACS.

Authors:  Jihong Wang; Jun Xu; Veera Baladandayuthapani
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Development of a randomised contrast detail digital phantom for observer detectability study.

Authors:  Ms Nizam; Kh Ng; Bjj Abdullah
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2006-07-01

9.  Diagnostic Discrepancies in Retinopathy of Prematurity Classification.

Authors:  J Peter Campbell; Michael C Ryan; Emily Lore; Peng Tian; Susan Ostmo; Karyn Jonas; R V Paul Chan; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Addressing the coming radiology crisis-the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology transforming the radiological interpretation process (TRIP) initiative.

Authors:  Katherine P Andriole; Richard L Morin; Ronald L Arenson; John A Carrino; Bradley J Erickson; Steven C Horii; David W Piraino; Bruce I Reiner; J Anthony Seibert; Eliot Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.