Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography.

Literature DB >> 22992865

ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography.

Kalpana M Kanal, Elizabeth Krupinski, Eric A Berns, William R Geiser, Andrew Karellas, Martha B Mainiero, Melissa C Martin, Samir B Patel, Daniel L Rubin, Jon D Shepard, Eliot L Siegel, Judith A Wolfman, Tariq A Mian, Mary C Mahoney.

Abstract

Entities: Gene

Mesh：

Year: 2013 PMID： 22992865 PMCID： PMC3553374 DOI： 10.1007/s10278-012-9521-3

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Digit Imaging ISSN： 0897-1889 Impact factor: 4.056

× No keyword cloud information.

44 in total

1. Image quality degradation by light scattering in display devices.

Authors: M J Flynn; A Badano
Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 4.056

2. Improved interpretation of digitized mammography with wavelet processing: a localization response operating characteristic study.

Authors: Maria Kallergi; John J Heine; Claudia G Berman; Marla R Hersh; A Pat Romilly; Robert A Clark
Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.959

3. Goniometric and conoscopic measurements of angular display contrast for one-, three-, five-, and nine-million-pixel medical liquid crystal displays.

Authors: Aldo Badano; Dipesh H Fifadara
Journal: Med Phys Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.071

4. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.

Authors: Ehsan Samei; Aldo Badano; Dev Chakraborty; Ken Compton; Craig Cornelius; Kevin Corrigan; Michael J Flynn; Bradley Hemminger; Nick Hangiandreou; Jeffrey Johnson; Donna M Moxley-Stevens; William Pavlicek; Hans Roehrig; Lois Rutz; Jeffrey Shepard; Robert A Uzenoff; Jihong Wang; Charles E Willis
Journal: Med Phys Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.071

5. Digital mammography image quality: image display.

Authors: Eliot Siegel; Elizabeth Krupinski; Ehsan Samei; Michael Flynn; Katherine Andriole; Bradley Erickson; Jerry Thomas; Aldo Badano; J Anthony Seibert; Etta D Pisano
Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.532

6. Mammography grid performance.

Authors: P S Rezentes; A de Almeida; G T Barnes
Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 11.105

7. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a radiographic screen-film combination.

Authors: P C Bunch; K E Huff; R Van Metter
Journal: J Opt Soc Am A Date: 1987-05 Impact factor: 2.129

8. Accuracy of segmentation of a commercial computer-aided detection system for mammography.

Authors: Jay A Baker; Eric L Rosen; Michele M Crockett; Joseph Y Lo
Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 11.105

9. Multiformat video and laser cameras: history, design considerations, acceptance testing, and quality control. Report of AAPM Diagnostic X-Ray Imaging Committee Task Group No. 1.

Authors: J E Gray; W F Anderson; C C Shaw; S J Shepard; L A Zeremba; P J Lin
Journal: Med Phys Date: 1993 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.071

10. The intensity of scattered radiation in mammography.

Authors: G T Barnes; I A Brezovich
Journal: Radiology Date: 1978-01 Impact factor: 11.105

5 in total

Review 1. [Ergonomically designed radiology workplace].

Authors: T Knogler; H Ringl
Journal: Radiologe Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 0.635

2. Investigation of Exposure Factors for Various Breast Composition and Thicknesses in Digital Screening Mammography Related to Breast Dose.

Authors: Khaled Alkhalifah; Ajit Brindhaban
Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 1.927