Literature DB >> 15118841

Comparison of wear and osteolysis in hip replacement using two different coatings of the femoral stem.

Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo1, David G Lewallen, William Scott Harmsen, Jeffrey Harrington, Miguel E Cabanela.   

Abstract

We compared the clinical and radiographic results of two matched series of total hip arthroplasties, one with hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems, the other with a similar but porous-coated femoral stem. The prevalence of radiographic osteolysis was 16% in hips with hydroxyapatite-coated stems and 43% in hips with porous-coated femoral stems. In hips with hydroxyapatite-coated stems, osteolysis was always limited to Gruen zones 1 and 7. In contrast, distal osteolysis was present around 26% of the porous-coated stems. At 7 years, the survival-free rate of distal osteolysis was 100% in hips with hydroxyapatite-coated stems but 90% in hips with porous-coated stems (p=0.04). Circumferential hydroxyapatite coating of the femoral component reduced the occurrence of osteolysis and eliminated distal osteolysis at 5-10 years of follow-up. In addition, hydroxyapatite coating did not alter the wear rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15118841      PMCID: PMC3456935          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-004-0558-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J G DeLee; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Effect of circumferential plasma-spray porous coating on the rate of femoral osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R H Emerson; S B Sanders; W C Head; L Higgins
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The fully hydroxyapatite-coated total hip implant. Clinical and roentgenographic results.

Authors:  R Vedantam; C Ruddlesdin
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Hydroxyapatite coated implants. Total hip arthroplasty in the young patient and patients with avascular necrosis.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio; W N Capello; M T Manley; J Feinberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old. Clinical and radiographic results after five to eight years of follow-up.

Authors:  W N Capello; J A D'Antonio; J R Feinberg; M T Manley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The hydroxyapatite-ABG hip system: 5- to 7-year results from an international multicentre study. The International ABG Study Group.

Authors:  A J Tonino; A I Rahmy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  The results at nine to twelve years of the use of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem.

Authors:  S A McNally; J A Shepperd; C V Mann; J P Walczak
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-04

9.  Sealing effect of hydroxyapatite coating on peri-implant migration of particles. An experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  O Rahbek; S Overgaard; M Lind; K Bendix; C Bünger; K Søballe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-04

10.  Complications with hydroxyapatite particulate separation in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R D Bloebaum; D Beeks; L D Dorr; C G Savory; J A DuPont; A A Hofmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  8 in total

1.  Excellent results with cementless total hip arthroplasty and alumina-on-alumina pairing: minimum ten-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alexander M Kress; Rainer Schmidt; Ulrich Holzwarth; Raimund Forst; Lutz A Mueller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Quantitative computer-assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R P Pitto; L A Mueller; K Reilly; R Schmidt; J Munro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Quantitative CT-assisted osteodensitometry of femoral adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Aknaksha Bhargava; Salil Pandit; Cameron Walker; Jacob T Munro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Annabel Hayward; Cameron Walker; Vickie B Shim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Total hip replacement arthroplasty with Mallory-Head system--minimum ten-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Joo-Hyoun Song; Dong-Hyun Kim; Juyoung Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Osseointegration in arthroplasty: can simvastatin promote bone response to implants?

Authors:  Kerem Başarir; Bülent Erdemli; Alp Can; Esra Erdemli; Tuğba Zeyrek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Does hydroxyapatite coating have no advantage over porous coating in primary total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun-Lin Chen; Tiao Lin; An Liu; Ming-Min Shi; Bin Hu; Zhong-Li Shi; Shi-Gui Yan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Hydroxyapatite coating does not improve uncemented stem survival after total hip arthroplasty!

Authors:  Nils P Hailer; Stergios Lazarinis; Keijo T Mäkelä; Antti Eskelinen; Anne M Fenstad; Geir Hallan; Leif Havelin; Søren Overgaard; Alma B Pedersen; Frank Mehnert; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.