Literature DB >> 17579860

Quantitative CT-assisted osteodensitometry of femoral adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Rocco P Pitto1, Aknaksha Bhargava, Salil Pandit, Cameron Walker, Jacob T Munro.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to measure bone density changes and to assess adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a taper-design femoral component using quantitative computer-tomography-assisted osteodensitometry. This method is able to differentiate cortical and cancellous bone structures. Twenty-seven consecutive patients (29 hips) with degenerative joint disease were enrolled in the study. Serial clinical, radiological and CT-osteodensitometry assessments were performed after the index operation. At the 2-year follow-up, the clinical outcome was rated satisfactory in all hips. The radiological assessment showed signs of osteointegration and stable fixation of all cups and stems. We observed a -17% decrease of cortical bone density and -22% decrease of cancellous bone density in the greater trochanter and femoral neck region. Cortical and cancellous bone density decrease at the level of the lesser trochanter was -9% and respectively -4%. We observed small changes of cortical bone density in the diaphyseal regions; in contrast, cancellous bone density increased (range 6% to 27%) in the diaphyseal regions. Overall, a trend of bone density recovery was observed throughout the follow-up period. Periprosthetic bone density changes at the 2-year follow-up are suggestive of stable osteointegration with proximal femoral diaphysis load transfer and moderate metaphyseal stress-shielding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17579860      PMCID: PMC2551722          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0389-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding.

Authors:  T Niinimäki; J Junila; P Jalovaara
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem.

Authors:  Alex Leali; Joseph F Fetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes with femoral components of differing design philosophy.

Authors:  C E Gibbons; A J Davies; A A Amis; H Olearnik; B C Parker; J E Scott
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results.

Authors:  C A Engh; J D Bobyn; A H Glassman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-01

5.  Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur.

Authors:  L D Dorr; M C Faugere; A M Mackel; T A Gruen; B Bognar; H H Malluche
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Prospective comparison of differences in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems.

Authors:  B Zerahn; G S Lausten; I-L Kanstrup
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Clinical outcome and periprosthetic bone remodelling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design.

Authors:  Rainer Schmidt; Lutz Mueller; Tobias E Nowak; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Osteodensitometry after total hip replacement with uncemented taper-design stem.

Authors:  Rainer Schmidt; Tobias E Nowak; Lutz Mueller; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Host-bone response to porous-coated cobalt-chrome and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components in hip arthroplasty. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of paired bilateral cases at 5 to 7 years.

Authors:  D F Scott; W L Jaffe
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Huiskes; H Weinans; M Dalstra
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  7 in total

1.  Changes in periprosthetic bone remodelling after redesigning an anatomic cementless stem.

Authors:  Juan J Panisello; Vicente Canales; Luis Herrero; Antonio Herrera; Jesús Mateo; María J Caballero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Loss of tibial bone density in patients with rotating- or fixed-platform TKA.

Authors:  Jacob T Munro; Salil Pandit; Cameron G Walker; Mark Clatworthy; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Annabel Hayward; Cameron Walker; Vickie B Shim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Analyzing bone remodeling patterns after total hip arthroplasty using quantitative computed tomography and patient-specific 3D computational models.

Authors:  Shanika Arachchi; Rocco P Pitto; Iain A Anderson; Vickie B Shim
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-08

5.  Quantitative CT with finite element analysis: towards a predictive tool for bone remodelling around an uncemented tapered stem.

Authors:  Vickie B Shim; Rocco P Pitto; Iain A Anderson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Five-year DEXA study of 88 hips with cemented femoral stem.

Authors:  Georgios Digas; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Periprosthetic bone loss: diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Loredana Cavalli; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-06-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.