Literature DB >> 19946775

Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study.

Rocco P Pitto1, Annabel Hayward, Cameron Walker, Vickie B Shim.   

Abstract

We measured bone density (BD) changes to assess adaptive bone remodelling five years after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with taper-design femoral component using quantitative computed-tomography-assisted osteodensitometry (qCT). Nineteen consecutive patients (21 hips) with degenerative joint disease were enrolled in the study. A press-fit cup and a tapered uncemented stem ceramic-ceramic pairing were used in all patients. Serial clinical, radiological and qCT osteodensitometry assessments were performed after the index operation and at the one, two and five year follow-ups. At the latest follow-up, the clinical outcome was rated satisfactory in all hips. The radiological assessment showed signs of osteointegration with stable fixation of all cups and stems. Overall, there was evidence of a BD loss at year five (p = 0.004). We estimate that BD loss was between 2.2% and 12.1% in comparison with baseline postoperative values. Progressive loss of BD in the metaphyseal region was observed in all hips. We found unremarkable BD changes of diaphyseal cortical BD throughout the five year follow-up period. qCT osteodensitometry technology allows differentiation of cortical and cancellous BD changes over time. Periprosthetic BD changes at the five year follow-up are suggestive of stable stem osteointegration with proximal femoral diaphysis load transfer and metaphyseal stress shielding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19946775      PMCID: PMC2989021          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0884-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of wear and osteolysis in hip replacement using two different coatings of the femoral stem.

Authors:  Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; David G Lewallen; William Scott Harmsen; Jeffrey Harrington; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem.

Authors:  Alex Leali; Joseph F Fetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Inter- and intraobserver assessment of periacetabular osteodensitometry after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography.

Authors:  Rainer Schmidt; Rocco Paolo Pitto; Alexander Kress; Cornelia Ehremann; Tobias Eckhard Nowak; Udo Reulbach; Raimund Forst; Lutz Müller
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Quantitative computer-assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R P Pitto; L A Mueller; K Reilly; R Schmidt; J Munro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Determination of periprosthetic bone density with the DEXA method after implantation of custom-made uncemented femoral stems.

Authors:  F Martini; S Sell; E Kremling; W Küsswetter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur.

Authors:  L D Dorr; M C Faugere; A M Mackel; T A Gruen; B Bognar; H H Malluche
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating accurate FE models of the femur and pelvis.

Authors:  Vickie B Shim; Rocco P Pitto; Robert M Streicher; Peter J Hunter; Iain A Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Computed tomography assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Salil Pandit; Andrew Graydon; Lyndon Bradley; Cameron Walker; Rocco Pitto
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.872

9.  Host-bone response to porous-coated cobalt-chrome and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components in hip arthroplasty. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of paired bilateral cases at 5 to 7 years.

Authors:  D F Scott; W L Jaffe
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Huiskes; H Weinans; M Dalstra
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  16 in total

1.  Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.

Authors:  Matthias Lerch; Annelene von der Haar-Tran; Henning Windhagen; Bernd A Behrens; Patrick Wefstaedt; Christina M Stukenborg-Colsman
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Outcome of short versus conventional stem for total hip arthroplasty in the femur with a high cortical index: a five year follow-up prospective multicentre comparative study.

Authors:  Francesco Pogliacomi; Paolo Schiavi; Guido Grappiolo; Francesco Ceccarelli; Enrico Vaienti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Changes of periprosthetic bone density after a cementless short hip stem: a clinical and radiological analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Jahnke; Sandra Engl; Corinna Altmeyer; Eike Jakubowitz; Jörn Bengt Seeger; Markus Rickert; Bernd Alexander Ishaque
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Analyzing bone remodeling patterns after total hip arthroplasty using quantitative computed tomography and patient-specific 3D computational models.

Authors:  Shanika Arachchi; Rocco P Pitto; Iain A Anderson; Vickie B Shim
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-08

5.  Bone remodelling around the Metha® short stem implant - Clinical and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results.

Authors:  Markus Fischer; Nicholas A Beckmann; Hans-Georg Simank
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-09

6.  Periprosthetic bone mineral density with a cementless triple tapered stem is dependent on daily activity.

Authors:  Shinya Hayashi; Takayuki Nishiyama; Takaaki Fujishiro; Noriyuki Kanzaki; Shingo Hashimoto; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Medium-term comparison of results in obese patients and non-obese hip prostheses with Metha® short stem.

Authors:  Yves Chammaï; Michel Brax
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-12-24

8.  Quantitative CT with finite element analysis: towards a predictive tool for bone remodelling around an uncemented tapered stem.

Authors:  Vickie B Shim; Rocco P Pitto; Iain A Anderson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Bone mineral density as a marker of hip implant longevity: a prospective assessment of a cementless stem with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at twenty years.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sessa; Luciano Costarella; Calogero Puma Pagliarello; Antonio Di Stefano; Andrea Sessa; Gianluca Testa; Vito Pavone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Restoration of proximal periprosthetic bone loss by denosumab in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Satoshi Nagoya; Kenji Tateda; Shunichiro Okazaki; Ima Kosukegawa; Junya Shimizu; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.