Literature DB >> 21940983

Is measured hearing aid benefit affected by seeing baseline outcome questionnaire responses?

ShienPei Silverman1, Megan Cates, Gabrielle Saunders.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether hearing aid outcome measured by the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI) for the Elderly/Adults (Newman, Weinstein, Jacobson, & Hug, 1990; Ventry & Weinstein, 1982) is differentially affected by informed vs. blind administration of the postfitting questionnaire.
METHOD: Participants completed the HHI at their hearing aid evaluation and again at their hearing aid follow-up visit. At follow-up, half received a clean HHI form (blind administration), whereas the remainder responded on their original form (informed administration) and could thus base their follow-up responses on those they gave at the hearing aid evaluation.
RESULTS: The data show that for the population examined here, informed administration of the follow-up HHI did not yield a different outcome to blind administration of the follow-up HHI. This was not influenced by past hearing aid use, age of the participant, or the duration of time between baseline questionnaire completion and follow-up completion.
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that completion of follow-up questionnaires in either informed or blind format will have little impact on HHI responses, most likely because of the many other factors that combined to influence hearing aid outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21940983      PMCID: PMC4724418          DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0003)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  32 in total

1.  Longitudinal changes in hearing aid satisfaction and usage in the elderly over a period of one or two years after hearing aid delivery.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Dana L Wilson; Nancy N Barlow; Carolyn B Garner; Nathan Amos
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Louise Hickson; Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

3.  Self-reported outcome in new hearing aid users over a 24-week post-fitting period.

Authors:  Kevin J Munro; Mark E Lutman
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Benefit acclimatization in elderly hearing aid users.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander; I M Taylor; G A Gray
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  The time course of hearing aid benefit.

Authors:  A R Horwitz; C W Turner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly.

Authors:  B E Weinstein; J B Spitzer; I M Ventry
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; L B Berman; M Townsend; S O Pugsley; L W Chambers
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Audiometric correlates of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the elderly.

Authors:  B E Weinstein; I M Ventry
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1983-11

9.  Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Sustained benefits of hearing aids.

Authors:  C D Mulrow; M R Tuley; C Aguilar
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.