Literature DB >> 11316050

Development of the Three-Clinic Hearing Aid Selection Profile (HASP).

G P Jacobson1, C W Newman, D A Fabry, S A Sandridge.   

Abstract

The Three-Clinic Hearing Aid Selection Profile (HASP) was developed to assess a patient's beliefs about a number of basic considerations felt to be critical to the hearing aid selection (HAS) process. These characteristics are felt to be key to the acceptance of amplification and include motivation, expectations, cost of goods and services, appearance (cosmesis), attitudes about technology, physical function/limitations, communication needs, and lifestyle. The results of the first investigation suggest that we have been successful in developing a 40-item metric with adequate internal consistency reliability that assesses the aforementioned characteristics. Second, results of the administration of this tool to a large group of individuals indicated that (1) age impacted scores on the Technology, Physical Function, and Communicative Needs subscales; (2) gender impacted scores on the Motivation, Expectation, Technology, Communicative Needs, and Appearance subscales; (3) previous hearing aid use affected scores on the Motivation subscale; (4) level of education impacted scores on the Physical Function and Lifestyle subscales; and (5) self-perceived hearing handicap had an effect on Motivation and Communicative Needs subscale scores. Percentile data collected from this subject sample are presented as a benchmark against which to evaluate responses from individual patients. Case studies are presented to illustrate the potential clinical utility of this device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11316050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  6 in total

1.  Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Louise Hickson; Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Considerations in the Development of a Sound Tolerance Interview and Questionnaire Instrument.

Authors:  LaGuinn P Sherlock; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 3.  APSO Standards: Implementing Hearing Aid Needs Assessments and Measuring Related Outcomes.

Authors:  Michelle L Arnold; Victoria A Sanchez
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2022-07-26

Review 4.  Applying the Hearing Aid Fitting Standard to Selection for Adults.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Richard A Roberts; Gina Angley; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2022-07-26

Review 5.  Sex-based Differences in Hearing Loss: Perspectives From Non-clinical Research to Clinical Outcomess.

Authors:  Dillan F Villavisanis; Elisa R Berson; Amanda M Lauer; Maura K Cosetti; Katrina M Schrode
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Satisfaction level with hearing aid in the daily life of Army Healthcare System users.

Authors:  Luciane R Veiga; Alvaro R C Merlo; Sotero S Mengue
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.