Literature DB >> 16938796

Self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users: Longitudinal trends and relationships between subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction.

Martin D Vestergaard1.   

Abstract

This study focussed on self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users. The objectives of the experiment were changes in self-report outcome over time, and relationships between different subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction. Four outcome inventories and a questionnaire on auditory lifestyle were administered to 25 hearing-aid users repeatedly after hearing-aid fitting, and assessments took place one week, four weeks, and 13 weeks after hearing-aid provision. The results showed that, for first-time users who used their hearing aids more than four hours per day, self-reported outcome increased over 13 weeks in some scales, although there was no change in amplification during this time. Furthermore, it was found that, for data collected immediately post-fitting, some subscales were much less face valid than for data collected later. This result indicates that the way in which hearing-aid users assess outcome changes over time. The practical consequence of the results is that early self-report outcome assessment may be misleading for some self-report outcome schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16938796      PMCID: PMC2361421          DOI: 10.1080/14992020600690977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  32 in total

1.  Validation of the SADL questionnaire.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Measuring Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life: the SADL scale.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Proceedings of a workshop on self-reported outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation including hearing aids. Eriksholm, Denmark, September 1-3, 1999.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation.

Authors:  R Cox; M Hyde; S Gatehouse; W Noble; H Dillon; R Bentler; D Stephens; S Arlinger; L Beck; D Wilkerson; S Kramer; P Kricos; J P Gagné; F Bess; L Hallberg
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Can we establish internationally equivalent outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation?

Authors:  S Arlinger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): results from The Netherlands.

Authors:  Sophia E Kramer; S Theo Goverts; Wouter A Dreschler; Monique Boymans; Joost M Festen
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and its relationship to the Client-oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI).

Authors:  Dafydd Stephens
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Translations of the International Outcome inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA).

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Dafydd Stephens; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Hearing-aid outcome measured following one month of hearing aid use by the elderly.

Authors:  L E Humes; C B Garner; D L Wilson; N N Barlow
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  8 in total

1.  Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Kathryn S Schwartz; Colleen M Noe; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Feasibility of ecological momentary assessment of hearing difficulties encountered by hearing aid users.

Authors:  Gino Galvez; Mitchel B Turbin; Emily J Thielman; Joseph A Istvan; Judy A Andrews; James A Henry
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Octav Chipara; Syed Shabih Hasan; Anne Welhaven; Jacob Oleson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Using a Digital Language Processor to Quantify the Auditory Environment and the Effect of Hearing Aids for Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kelsey E Klein; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Ruth A Bentler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Satisfaction and compliance of adult patients using hearing aid and evaluation of factors affecting them.

Authors:  Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz; Ömer Bayır; Serap Er; Eray Işık; Güleser Saylam; Emel Çadallı Tatar; Ali Özdek
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Psychometric properties of a revised Danish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).

Authors:  Charlotte Thunberg Jespersen; Michael Bille; Jonas Vester Legarth
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Patient Benefit Following Bimodal CI-provision: Self-reported Abilities vs. Hearing Status.

Authors:  Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke; Tobias Balkenhol; Svetlana Hetjens; Nicole Rotter; Jerome J Servais
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Results of hearing aids use dispensed by a publicly-funded health service.

Authors:  Juliana Harumi Iwahashi; Isabela de Souza Jardim; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.