Literature DB >> 17494874

Evidence for the use of hearing assistive technology by adults: the role of the FM system.

Theresa Hnath Chisolm1, Colleen M Noe, Rachel McArdle, Harvey Abrams.   

Abstract

Hearing assistive technologies include listening, alerting, and/or signaling devices that use auditory, visual, and/or tactile modalities to augment communication and/or facilitate awareness of environmental sounds. The importance of hearing assistive technologies in the management of adults with hearing loss was recently acknowledged in an evidence-based clinical practice guideline developed by the American Academy of Audiology. Most currently available evidence for hearing assistive technology use by adults focuses on frequency-modulated (FM) technology. Previous research is reviewed that demonstrates the efficacy of FM devices for adults in terms of laboratory measures of speech understanding in noise. Also reviewed are the outcomes from field trials of FM use by community-dwelling adults, which, to date, have been disappointing. Few to no individuals, in previous studies, elected to use FM devices at the end of the trial periods. Data are presented from a 1-group pretest-posttest study examining the role of extensive counseling, coaching, and instruction on FM use by adults. In addition, the potential influence of the cost of devices to the individual was eliminated by conducting the study with veterans who were eligible to receive FM systems through the Veterans Affairs National Hearing Aid Program. Positive outcomes were obtained at the end of a 6-week trial period and were found to remain 1 year after study completion. Implications for increasing the evidence base for the use of FM devices by adults are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17494874      PMCID: PMC4111410          DOI: 10.1177/1084713807300879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  14 in total

1.  Speech perception in noise: directional microphones versus frequency modulation (FM) systems.

Authors:  M Samantha Lewis; Carl C Crandell; Michael Valente; Jane Enrietto Horn
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Louise Hickson; Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Evidence-based practice in provision of amplification.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Comparison of conventional amplification and an assistive listening device in elderly persons.

Authors:  J Jerger; R Chmiel; E Florin; F Pirozzolo; N Wilson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids.

Authors:  H Dillon; A James; J Ginis
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability.

Authors:  D N Kalikow; K N Stevens; L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly-to-moderately hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems.

Authors:  D B Hawkins
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1984-11

9.  The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool.

Authors:  I M Ventry; B E Weinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Development of the communication profile for the hearing impaired.

Authors:  M E Demorest; S A Erdman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1987-05
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laura Turton; Pamela Souza; Linda Thibodeau; Louise Hickson; René Gifford; Judith Bird; Maren Stropahl; Lorraine Gailey; Bernadette Fulton; Nerina Scarinci; Katie Ekberg; Barbra Timmer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

Review 2.  Aphasia and Auditory Processing after Stroke through an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Lens.

Authors:  Suzanne C Purdy; Iruni Wanigasekara; Oscar M Cañete; Celia Moore; Clare M McCann
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-08

Review 3.  Conventional Amplification for Children and Adults with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lindsey E Jorgensen; Emily A Benson; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

4.  Speech understanding in noise with the Roger Pen, Naida CI Q70 processor, and integrated Roger 17 receiver in a multi-talker network.

Authors:  Geert De Ceulaer; Julie Bestel; Hans E Mülder; Felix Goldbeck; Sebastien Pierre Janssens de Varebeke; Paul J Govaerts
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.503

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.