Literature DB >> 23744085

[User benefit of modern hearing aids. A comparative study].

J Kießling1, S Kreikemeier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the face of the rapid development of hearing aid system technology it is helpful to regularly study the user benefit of the current generation. TEST PERSONS AND METHODS: To contribute to the question on how the user benefit of current hearing aids compares with the benefit of the previous generation of hearing aids, a multicentre study was carried out in cooperation with 79 hearing aid acoustics companies in Germany. The user benefit of modern hearing aids in everyday life was assessed by asking end users to participate in a survey by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of 20 items, 10 of which were taken from validated international inventories (SSQ: Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale, IOI-HA: International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids) and the other 10 were formulated particularly for this purpose.
RESULTS: A total of 664 usable questionnaires were returned whereby 421 responders were first time users and 243 responders were previous hearing aid users. The results of the present study showed that modern hearing aid system technology provides significant extra benefits at the 5 % level relative to the previous generation of hearing aids for all variables tested in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: Even though the amount of gain in terms of user benefit may be overestimated due to well-known placebo effects, an obvious net effect was evident. Correlations between the level of hearing aid benefit and possible influencing factors, such as age, gender, subjects own hearing aid, duration of use or hearing loss, could not be identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23744085     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-013-2697-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  26 in total

1.  Trial of a two-channel hearing aid (low-frequency compression-high-frequency linear amplification) with school age children.

Authors:  J Bamford; W McCracken; I Peers; P Grayson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.

Authors:  M Boymans; W A Dreschler
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

3.  The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Translations of the International Outcome inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA).

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Dafydd Stephens; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Norms for the international outcome inventory for hearing aids.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander; Cynthia M Beyer
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Clinical trials with a programmable hearing aid set for various listening environments.

Authors:  A Ringdahl; M Eriksson-Mangold; B Israelsson; A Lindkvist; S Mangold
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1990-08

7.  Comparison of psychometric properties of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-hA) in various studies.

Authors:  Heike Heuermann; Martin Kinkel; Jürgen Tchorz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Survey on hearing aid use and satisfaction in Switzerland and their determinants.

Authors:  Sibylle Bertoli; Katharina Staehelin; Elisabeth Zemp; Christian Schindler; Daniel Bodmer; Rudolf Probst
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Clinical trial of a digital hearing aid.

Authors:  S Arlinger; E Billermark; M Oberg; T Lunner; J Hellgren
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1998

10.  Hearing aid satisfaction and use in the advanced digital era.

Authors:  Ricky Kaplan-Neeman; Chava Muchnik; Minka Hildesheimer; Yael Henkin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  5 in total

1.  Guideline "Implantable hearing aids"-short version : German S2k guideline of the Working Group of German-Speaking Audiologists, Neurootologists and Otologists (ADANO), of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO) in collaboration with the German Society of Audiology (DGA), the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology (DGPP), and patient representatives.

Authors:  D Beutner; W Delb; H Frenzel; U Hoppe; K B Hüttenbrink; R Mlynski; A Limberger; R Schönweiler; B Schwab; I Todt; M Walger; T Wesarg; T Zahnert; R Zeh
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Guideline "Implantable hearing aids"-short version : German S2k guideline of the Working Group of German-speaking Audiologists, Neurootologists and Otologists (ADANO), of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO) in collaboration with the German Society of Audiology (DGA), the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology (DGPP), and patient representatives].

Authors:  D Beutner; W Delb; H Frenzel; U Hoppe; K B Hüttenbrink; R Mlynski; A Limberger; R Schönweiler; B Schwab; I Todt; M Walger; T Wesarg; T Zahnert; R Zeh
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Development and use of an APHAB database].

Authors:  J Löhler; B Akcicek; T Kappe; P Schlattmann; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  [Detection of hearing loss in dementia patients : pilot study and literature survey].

Authors:  S Eichhorn; G Hesse; A Laubert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  Hearing aids: indications, technology, adaptation, and quality control.

Authors:  Ulrich Hoppe; Gerhard Hesse
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.