Literature DB >> 14968260

Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature.

Markus Völk1, Okka W Hamer, Stefan Feuerbach, Michael Strotzer.   

Abstract

The two most frequently performed diagnostic X-ray examinations are those of the extremities and of the chest. Thus, dose reduction in the field of conventional skeletal and chest radiography is an important issue and there is a need to reduce man-made ionizing radiation. The large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide provides a significant reduction of radiation dose in skeletal and chest radiography compared with traditional imaging systems. This article describes the technical background and basic image quality parameters of this 43 x 43-cm digital system, and summarizes the available literature (years 2000-2003) concerning dose reduction in experimental and clinical studies. Due to its high detective quantum efficiency and dynamic range compared with traditional screen-film systems, a dose reduction of up to 50% is possible without loss of image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14968260     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2243-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  28 in total

1.  Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.

Authors:  M Strotzer; M Völk; T Wild; P von Landenberg; S Feuerbach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  [First clinical experience with a full-size, flat-panel detector for imaging the peripheral skeletal system].

Authors:  S Reissberg; C Hoeschen; A Kästner; U Theus; R Fiedler; U Krause; W Döhring
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2001-11

3.  Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.

Authors:  Karl Ludwig; Horst Lenzen; Karl-Friedrich Kamm; Thomas M Link; Stefan Diederich; Dag Wormanns; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.

Authors:  Karl Ludwig; Andreas Henschel; Thomas M Bernhardt; Horst Lenzen; Dag Wormanns; Stefan Diederich; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Routine skeleton radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality and clinical acceptance at 50% dose reduction.

Authors:  Markus Völk; Christian Paetzel; Peter Angele; Johannes S Seitz; Bernd Füchtmeier; Reiner Hente; Stefan Feuerbach; Michael Strotzer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Flat-panel x-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology. Reduced radiation dose for the detection of foreign bodies.

Authors:  M Völk; M Strotzer; J Gmeinwieser; J Alexander; R Fründ; J Seitz; C Manke; M Spahn; S Feuerbach
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography.

Authors:  M Völk; M Strotzer; N Holzknecht; C Manke; M Lenhart; J Gmeinwieser; J Link; M Reiser; S Feuerbach
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Digital image composition in long-leg radiography with a flat-panel detector: first clinical experiences.

Authors:  Marcus Völk; Peter Angele; Okka Hamer; Stefan Feuerbach; Michael Strotzer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.

Authors:  Okka W Hamer; Markus Völk; Zorger Zorger; Stefan Feuerbach; Michael Strotzer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.

Authors:  Klaus Bacher; Peter Smeets; Kris Bonnarens; An De Hauwere; Koenraad Verstraete; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  16 in total

1.  Flat-panel versus 64-channel computed tomography for in vivo quantitative characterization of aortic atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Ibrahim Aboshady; Dianna D Cody; Evan M Johnson; Amir Gahremanpour; Deborah Vela; Kamal G Khalil; Herbert L Dupont; James T Willerson; L Maximilian Buja; Gregory W Gladish
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Flat panel computed tomography of human ex vivo heart and bone specimens: initial experience.

Authors:  Konstantin Nikolaou; Thomas Flohr; Karl Stierstorfer; Christoph R Becker; Maximilian F Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Flat detectors and their clinical applications.

Authors:  Martin Spahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Reducing dose in urography while maintaining image quality-a comparison of storage phosphor plates and a flat-panel detector.

Authors:  Margareta Jansson; Håkan Geijer; Jan Persliden; Torbjörn Andersson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.

Authors:  Wouter J H Veldkamp; Lucia J M Kroft; Mireille V Boot; Bart J A Mertens; Jacob Geleijns
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Should 3K zoom function be used for detection of pneumothorax in cesium iodide/amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiographs presented on 1K-matrix soft copies?

Authors:  Karin A Herrmann; H M Bonél; A Stäbler; M Voelk; M Strotzer; C J Zech; M F Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.

Authors:  Michael Gruber; Martin Uffmann; Michael Weber; Mathias Prokop; Csilla Balassy; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Pulmonary nodule detection with digital projection radiography: an ex-vivo study on increased latitude post-processing.

Authors:  Juergen Biederer; Tobias Gottwald; Hendrik Bolte; Christian Riedel; Sandra Freitag; Richard Van Metter; Martin Heller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  [Dose reduction and adequate image quality in digital radiography: a contradiction?].

Authors:  S Pötter-Lang; M Dünkelmeyer; M Uffmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Patient dose evaluation by means of DICOM images for a direct radiography system.

Authors:  O Rampado; E Garelli; R Zatteri; U Escoffier; R De Lucchi; R Ropolo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.