Literature DB >> 11818613

Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.

Karl Ludwig1, Horst Lenzen, Karl-Friedrich Kamm, Thomas M Link, Stefan Diederich, Dag Wormanns, Walter Heindel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare a large-area direct-readout flat-panel detector system with a conventional screen-film system and a storage-phosphor system in detecting small artificial osseous lesions simulating osteolytic disease and to assess diagnostic performance with decreasing exposure dose.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Artificial lesions (0.5-3.0 mm) were created in 100 of 200 predefined regions in 20 porcine femoral specimens. Specimens were enclosed in containers filled with water to create absorption and scatter radiation conditions comparable with those in a human extremity. Imaging was performed with a flat-panel detector system, a conventional screen-film system, and a storage-phosphor system. Levels of exposure equivalent to speed classes 400, 800, 1600, and 3200 were used. In all images, the presence or absence of a lesion was assessed by three radiologists using a five-point confidence scale. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for 4,800 observations (600 for each imaging modality and exposure level) and diagnostic performance estimated with the area under the ROC curve (A(z)). The significance of differences in diagnostic performance was tested with analysis of variance.
RESULTS: ROC analysis showed A(z) values of 0.820 (speed class 400), 0.780 (class 800), 0.758 (class 1600), and 0.676 (class 3200) for the flat-panel detector; 0.761 (class 400), 0.725 (class 800), and 0.662 (class 1600) for the storage-phosphor system; and 0.788 (class 400) for the conventional screen-film system. The A(z) value for the flat-panel detector at speed class 400 was significantly higher than that for all other systems (P <.05). A(z) values for the speed class 400 screen-film system and flat-panel detector system at speed class 800 were not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: The flat-panel detector has diagnostic performance superior to that of conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography for detecting small artificial osseous lesions at clinical exposure settings. With the flat-panel detector, exposure dose can be reduced by 50% to obtain diagnostic performance comparable with that of a conventional speed class 400 screen-film system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11818613     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2222010276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.

Authors:  Karl Ludwig; Andreas Henschel; Thomas M Bernhardt; Horst Lenzen; Dag Wormanns; Stefan Diederich; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Markus Völk; Okka W Hamer; Stefan Feuerbach; Michael Strotzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Bone infections].

Authors:  A H Tiemann; R Braunschweig; G O Hofmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Reduction of radiation dose for cerebral angiography using flat panel detector of direct conversion type: a vascular phantom study.

Authors:  Y Hatakeyama; S Kakeda; N Ohnari; J Moriya; N Oda; K Nishino; W Miyamoto; Y Korogi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Investigation of optimum anti-scatter grid selection for digital radiography: physical imaging properties and detectability of low-contrast signals.

Authors:  Nobukazu Tanaka; Kentaro Naka; Aya Saito; Junji Morishita; Fukai Toyofuku; Masafumi Ohki; Yoshiharu Higashida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-08-08

Review 6.  [Digital radiography of the chest in pediatric patients].

Authors:  S Puig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Intracranial 2D and 3D DSA with flat panel detector of the direct conversion type: initial experience.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Hatakeyama; Shingo Kakeda; Yukunori Korogi; Norihiro Ohnari; Junji Moriya; Nobuhiro Oda; Kazuyoshi Nishino; Wataru Miyamoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 7.034

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.