Literature DB >> 15856242

Reducing dose in urography while maintaining image quality-a comparison of storage phosphor plates and a flat-panel detector.

Margareta Jansson1, Håkan Geijer, Jan Persliden, Torbjörn Andersson.   

Abstract

The introduction of new flat-panel detector technology often forces us to accept too high dose levels as proposed by the manufacturers. We need a tool to compare the image quality of a new system with the accepted standard. The aim of this study was to obtain a comparable image quality for two systems-storage phosphor plates and a flat-panel system using intravenous urography (IVU) as a clinical model. The image quality figure was calculated using a contrast-detail phantom (CDRAD) for the two evaluated systems. This allowed us to set a dose for the flat-panel system that gave equivalent image quality to the storage phosphor plates. This reduced detector dose was used in an evaluation of clinical images to find out if the dose reduction from the phantom study indeed resulted in images of equal clinical image quality. The image quality was assessed using image criteria of the European guidelines for IVU with visual grading analysis. Equivalent image quality in image pairs was achieved at 30% of the dose. The CDRAD contrast-detail phantom makes it possible to find dose levels that give equal image quality using different imaging systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15856242     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2772-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  7 in total

1.  Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study.

Authors:  H Geijer; K W Beckman; T Andersson; J Persliden
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  [Comparison of flat-panel radiography and computed radiography in urography].

Authors:  M Zähringer; K F Kamm; B Krug; W Braun; S Coburger; G Winnekendonk; K Krüger; G Haupt; K Lackner
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2002-05

3.  Reducing the radiation dose during excretory urography: flat-panel silicon x-ray detector versus computed radiography.

Authors:  M Zähringer; V Hesselmann; O Schulte; K F Kamm; W Braun; G Haupt; B Krug; K Lackner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on a large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen.

Authors:  Terue Okamura; Saori Tanaka; Koichi Koyama; Nishida Norihumi; Hideo Daikokuya; Toshiyuki Matsuoka; Kenji Kishimoto; Masakatsu Hatagawa; Hiroaki Kudoh; Ryusaku Yamada
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Markus Völk; Okka W Hamer; Stefan Feuerbach; Michael Strotzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  X-ray detectors for digital radiography.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index.

Authors:  Sinead E Peters; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Intracranial 2D and 3D DSA with flat panel detector of the direct conversion type: initial experience.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Hatakeyama; Shingo Kakeda; Yukunori Korogi; Norihiro Ohnari; Junji Moriya; Nobuhiro Oda; Kazuyoshi Nishino; Wataru Miyamoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 7.034

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.