PURPOSE: This investigation was intended to show that exposures of the peripheral skeleton system can be done with half of the dose used for conventional screen-film systems with a full-size CsI/a-Si flat panel detector. MATERIAL AN METHODS: 120 exposures of the wrist and 100 exposures of the ankle have been made on a full-size flat panel detector system (43 x 43 cm). The patient dose has been reduced by a factor of two compared to conventional images. Five radiologists evaluated every image as a softcopy and a hardcopy image. For the evaluation, a variation of the Visual Grading Analysis (VGA) without reference images was used. For the determination of the patient entrance dose, measurement of a phantom were performed. RESULTS: A dose reduction of about 50 % is possible with the same or even better image quality in routine diagnostics. Only 3 % of the ankle and approx. 21 % of the wrist exposures required a postprocessing. Exposures with implants did not show any artifacts and some of the those achieved better evaluation results compared with exposures without implants. CONCLUSION: A halving of the patient dose is possible with acceptable results for the image quality. The effect of an improved image processing remains to be evaluated. The patient entrance dose is suitable for an evaluation of a radiographic detector and especially for a dose-referred comparison of digital X-ray units.
PURPOSE: This investigation was intended to show that exposures of the peripheral skeleton system can be done with half of the dose used for conventional screen-film systems with a full-size CsI/a-Si flat panel detector. MATERIAL AN METHODS: 120 exposures of the wrist and 100 exposures of the ankle have been made on a full-size flat panel detector system (43 x 43 cm). The patient dose has been reduced by a factor of two compared to conventional images. Five radiologists evaluated every image as a softcopy and a hardcopy image. For the evaluation, a variation of the Visual Grading Analysis (VGA) without reference images was used. For the determination of the patient entrance dose, measurement of a phantom were performed. RESULTS: A dose reduction of about 50 % is possible with the same or even better image quality in routine diagnostics. Only 3 % of the ankle and approx. 21 % of the wrist exposures required a postprocessing. Exposures with implants did not show any artifacts and some of the those achieved better evaluation results compared with exposures without implants. CONCLUSION: A halving of the patient dose is possible with acceptable results for the image quality. The effect of an improved image processing remains to be evaluated. The patient entrance dose is suitable for an evaluation of a radiographic detector and especially for a dose-referred comparison of digital X-ray units.