Literature DB >> 14730398

Prospective comparison of differences in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems.

B Zerahn1, G S Lausten, I-L Kanstrup.   

Abstract

We compared the differences in bone mineral density (BMD) adjacent to two biomechanically different cementless femoral stems (Spotorno and Evolution-K). Measurements were performed within the first week after surgery and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively in a prospective study of 31 patients with 37 total hip arthroplasties. A modified Harris hip score and a visual analogue score for patient satisfaction was used to evaluate the clinical outcome. For both stems, dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements revealed a decrease in BMD in Gruen zone 7. Patients with a Spotorno stem also had a significant decrease in BMD in zones 1 and 2. In patients with an Evolution-K stem, there was a positive correlation between the clinical outcome and BMD in Gruen zones 1 and 4. Our data suggest that periprosthetic bone loss is equal to if not less pronounced adjacent to the Evolution-K stem as compared to the Spotorno stem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14730398      PMCID: PMC3474486          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-003-0534-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  14 in total

1.  Changes in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Zerahn; M Storgaard; T Johansen; C Olsen; G Lausten; I L Kanstrup
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Evaluation of periprosthetic bone using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: precision of the method and effect of operation on bone mineral density.

Authors:  H Kröger; H Miettinen; I Arnala; E Koski; N Rushton; O Suomalainen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Determination of periprosthetic bone density with the DEXA method after implantation of custom-made uncemented femoral stems.

Authors:  F Martini; S Sell; E Kremling; W Küsswetter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Periprosthetic bone loss and regional bone turnover in uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study using high resolution single photon emission tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  H Kröger; E Vanninen; M Overmyer; H Miettinen; N Rushton; O Suomalainen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes with femoral components of differing design philosophy.

Authors:  C E Gibbons; A J Davies; A A Amis; H Olearnik; B C Parker; J E Scott
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Altered load history affects periprosthetic bone loss following cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J M Bryan; D R Sumner; D E Hurwitz; G S Tompkins; T P Andriacchi; J O Galante
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Cohen; N Rushton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-05

8.  Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom.

Authors:  E S Mortimer; L Rosenthall; I Paterson; J D Bobyn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Bone loss around failed femoral implant measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  P Venesmaa; H Kröger; H Miettinen; J Jurvelin; O Suomalainen; E Alhava
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.601

10.  Periprosthetic mineralization around cementless total hip endoprosthesis: longitudinal study and cross-sectional study on titanium threaded acetabular cup and cementless Spotorno stem with DEXA.

Authors:  D Sabo; A Reiter; H G Simank; M Thomsen; M Lukoschek; V Ewerbeck
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative computer-assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R P Pitto; L A Mueller; K Reilly; R Schmidt; J Munro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Quantitative CT-assisted osteodensitometry of femoral adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Aknaksha Bhargava; Salil Pandit; Cameron Walker; Jacob T Munro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Annabel Hayward; Cameron Walker; Vickie B Shim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Pooled outcome of total hip arthroplasty with the CementLess Spotorno (CLS) system: a comparative analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Patrick Sadoghi; Wolfgang Janda; Mark Agreiter; Rauend Rauf; Andreas Leithner; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Five-year DEXA study of 88 hips with cemented femoral stem.

Authors:  Georgios Digas; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY WITH BIOMEC PROSTHESIS: 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP.

Authors:  Rodrigo Benedet Scheidt; Ricardo Rosito; Carlos Alberto De Souza Macedo; Carlos Roberto Galia
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.