Literature DB >> 7744941

Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty.

B Cohen1, N Rushton.   

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is increasingly used to measure changes in bone mineral density (BMD) around femoral prostheses after total hip arthroplasty. We have studied the factors which affect the accuracy of these measurements. The coefficient of variation was < 2% using a hydroxyapatite phantom, 2.7% in an anthropomorphic phantom specimen, and < 1% in repeated measurements on implanted cadaver femora. The precision did not vary with different implant materials or designs. In patients we found a mean precision error of 2.7% to 3.4%. The most significant factor affecting reproducibility was rotation of the femur. We conclude that DEXA is a precise method of measurement for small changes in BMD around femoral implants, but that correct and careful positioning of patients is essential to obtain reliable results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7744941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  30 in total

1.  Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.

Authors:  Matthias Lerch; Annelene von der Haar-Tran; Henning Windhagen; Bernd A Behrens; Patrick Wefstaedt; Christina M Stukenborg-Colsman
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Periprosthetic bone remodeling after 12 years differs in cemented and uncemented hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Prakash Chandran; Mohammed Azzabi; Mark Andrews; John G Bradley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Changes of bone mineral density after cementless total hip arthroplasty with two different stems.

Authors:  Keiji Sano; Kouji Ito; Kengo Yamamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Quantitative computer-assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R P Pitto; L A Mueller; K Reilly; R Schmidt; J Munro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Changes in periprosthetic bone remodelling after redesigning an anatomic cementless stem.

Authors:  Juan J Panisello; Vicente Canales; Luis Herrero; Antonio Herrera; Jesús Mateo; María J Caballero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Long-term periprosthetic remodeling in THA shows structural preservation.

Authors:  James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Effect of etidronate in preventing periprosthetic bone loss following cemented hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Radko Komadina; Alenka Repse-Fokter
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Randomised clinical trial assessing migration of uncemented primary total hip replacement stems, with and without autologous impaction bone grafting.

Authors:  Michael Rutherford; Riaz J K Khan; Daniel P Fick; Samantha Haebich; Oscar Nivbrant; Thomas Kozak
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Bone mineral density of the femoral neck in resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeannette Østergaard Penny; Ole Ovesen; Kim Brixen; Jens-Erik Varmarken; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years.

Authors:  Per Y Adolphson; Mats O F Salemyr; Olof G Sköldenberg; Henrik S G Bodén
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.