Literature DB >> 9437053

Periprosthetic mineralization around cementless total hip endoprosthesis: longitudinal study and cross-sectional study on titanium threaded acetabular cup and cementless Spotorno stem with DEXA.

D Sabo1, A Reiter, H G Simank, M Thomsen, M Lukoschek, V Ewerbeck.   

Abstract

In a prospective longitudinal study over 2 years and a separate cross-sectional study more than 5 years after operation, we analyzed periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) after cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) (press-fit cementless Spotorno stem, Mecron threaded acetabular cup) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). BMD was analyzed in a longitudinal prospective study (n = 53 patients: 29 women, 24 men) and in a separate cross-sectional study (n = 23 patients: 13 women, 10 men) with good clinical outcome (Merle d' Aubigne score > 12). Regions of interest were defined according to Gruen (ROI 1-7) and as netto average ROI (NETAVG I) for the periprosthetic femur, and according to De Lee and Charnley (ROI I-III) and as NETAVG II for the periprosthetic acetabulum. BMD during follow-up was compared with immediate postoperative values of the affected limb. Mean precision error (CV%) was 2.6 +/- 0.5% for ROI 1-7 and 1.3 +/- 0.9% for ROI I-III. BMD significantly decreased in the periprosthetic femur and acetabulum during the first 3 months after operation. At the femur, BMD (NETAVG I) for women and men, respectively, was 92.4% and 87.5% at 6 months, then 89.4% and 96.2% at 2 years. ROIs around the proximal stem showed the lowest absolute values and decreased most during follow-up (to 79.9% ROI 1 and 68.2% ROI 7, respectively). Mineralization around the cup (NETAVG II), respectively, amounted to 81.1%, 82.6% at 6 months, then 80.1% and 93.8% at 2 years. The medially placed ROI II demineralized most (respectively, 72.1% and 76.7%). More than 5 years after THA, BMD in the femur showed little change, but decreased significantly to 76.4% and 79.1%, respectively, around the cup (NETAVG II). DEXA is a useful method for analyzing changes of mineralization around cup and stem of cementless THA. The results reflect the different stress on the periprosthetic bone after implantation of THA in defined ROIs, supporting earlier reported good clinical results of the Spotorno stem and increased loosening rate of threaded acetabular cups after 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9437053     DOI: 10.1007/s002239900413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  19 in total

1.  Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.

Authors:  Matthias Lerch; Annelene von der Haar-Tran; Henning Windhagen; Bernd A Behrens; Patrick Wefstaedt; Christina M Stukenborg-Colsman
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss.

Authors:  A I A Rahmy; T Gosens; G M Blake; A Tonino; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].

Authors:  A Roth; G Richartz; K Sander; A Sachse; R Fuhrmann; A Wagner; R-A Venbrocks
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Proximally versus fully porous-coated femoral stems: a multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Steven J MacDonald; Seth Rosenzweig; Jeffrey S Guerin; Richard W McCalden; Eric R Bohm; Robert B Bourne; Cecil H Rorabeck; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Densitometric evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodeling.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Valentina Cervi; Nicola Piolanti; Gianluca Ciapini; Lorenzo Andreani; Iacopo Castellini; Andrea Poggetti; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-09

6.  Late remodeling around a proximally HA-coated tapered titanium femoral component.

Authors:  William N Capello; James A D'Antonio; Rudolph G Geesink; Judy R Feinberg; Marybeth Naughton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Bone mineral density of the femoral neck in resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeannette Østergaard Penny; Ole Ovesen; Kim Brixen; Jens-Erik Varmarken; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Changes in bone mineral density of the distal femur after revision total knee arthroplasty with metaphyseal press-fit stem.

Authors:  Claus L Jensen; Michael M Petersen; Henrik M Schrøder; Bjarne Lund
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07-15

9.  Prospective comparison of differences in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems.

Authors:  B Zerahn; G S Lausten; I-L Kanstrup
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Periprosthetic mineralization changes around femoral stems: a prospective 12-month study with DEXA.

Authors:  Marco Galli; Antonio Leone; Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli; Tommaso Pirronti; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.