| Literature DB >> 27022535 |
Rodrigo Benedet Scheidt1, Ricardo Rosito2, Carlos Alberto De Souza Macedo3, Carlos Roberto Galia4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes from total hip arthroplasty using the Biomec prosthesis over a 20-year period (1988 to 2009).Entities:
Keywords: Arthroplasty, hip; Biomechanics; Hip/surgery
Year: 2015 PMID: 27022535 PMCID: PMC4799109 DOI: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30286-X
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Figure 1Sample distribution in accordance with the functional evaluation proposed by D'Aubigné and Postel
Figure 2Sample distribution according to the presence of osteolysis and location in accordance with the DeLee and Charnley zones. In this case, we considered that osteopenia was present in area II.
Figure 3Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis on a patient with 17 years of follow-up on the right side and 16 years on the left side.
Sample distribution in relation to femoral osteolysis, in accordance with the criteria of Turibio
| Turibio grade | Cases | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1.20 |
| 1 | 29 | 34.50 |
| 2 | 42 | 50.00 |
| 3 | 10 | 11.90 |
| 4 | 2 | 2.40 |
0 – absence of osteolysis
1 – osteolysis restricted to the region of the greater trochanter
2 – osteolysis extending from the region of the greater trochanter towards the lesser trochanter
3 – osteolysis affecting both the greater and the lesser trochanter and extending to the middle third of the diaphysis
4 – osteolysis throughout the region of the femoral implant.
Figure 4Radiograph on the left hip demonstrating femoral osteopenia affecting the regions of the greater and lesser trochanters, without compromising the stability and fixation of the femoral implant.
Figure 5Sample distribution according to the frequency and magnitude of migration of the femoral nail.