Literature DB >> 8872543

Determination of periprosthetic bone density with the DEXA method after implantation of custom-made uncemented femoral stems.

F Martini1, S Sell, E Kremling, W Küsswetter.   

Abstract

Implantation of a total hip replacement leads to resorption of bone, especially in the upper femoral shaft and this depends mainly on the design of the stem, and also on the survival time of the implant. Density of the periprosthetic bone was examined with the DEXA method in both femurs in 27 patients at a mean of 21 months after implantation of uncemented custom-made femoral stems. A loss of bone density between 5% and 21% was found which was independent of the survival time of the implant. The maximum decrease was at the upper medial part of the calcar. The negligible loss of bone density, compared to other reports, favours the use of a computer tomography assisted custom-made femoral stem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8872543     DOI: 10.1007/s002640050067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  9 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative computer-assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R P Pitto; L A Mueller; K Reilly; R Schmidt; J Munro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Quantitative CT-assisted osteodensitometry of femoral adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Aknaksha Bhargava; Salil Pandit; Cameron Walker; Jacob T Munro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Changes in periprosthetic bone remodelling after redesigning an anatomic cementless stem.

Authors:  Juan J Panisello; Vicente Canales; Luis Herrero; Antonio Herrera; Jesús Mateo; María J Caballero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Annabel Hayward; Cameron Walker; Vickie B Shim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty using 3D image-based custom stems in unselected patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Nogier; I Tourabaly; S Ramos-Pascual; J H Müller; M Saffarini; C Courtin
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-12-10

6.  Prospective comparison of differences in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems.

Authors:  B Zerahn; G S Lausten; I-L Kanstrup
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Periprosthetic bone loss after insertion of an uncemented, customized femoral stem and an uncemented anatomical stem. A randomized DXA study with 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mona Nysted; Pål Benum; Jomar Klaksvik; Olav Foss; Arild Aamodt
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Periprosthetic bone density changes after MiniHipTM cementless femoral short stem: one-year results of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.

Authors:  Ahmet Ercan; Sherif M Sokkar; Gebhard Schmid; Timm J Filler; Ashraf Abdelkafy; Joerg Jerosch
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-11-18

9.  Reference Intervals in Combined Veterinary Clinical Examinations of Male Black-Spotted Pond Frogs (Pelophylax nigromaculatus).

Authors:  Jun-Kyu Park; Jeong-Bae Kim; Yuno Do
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.