Literature DB >> 20649234

The effects of frequency-place shift on consonant confusion in cochlear implant simulations.

Ning Zhou1, Li Xu, Chao-Yang Lee.   

Abstract

The effects of frequency-place shift on consonant recognition and confusion matrices were examined. Frequency-place shift was manipulated using a noise-excited vocoder with 4 to 16 channels. In the vocoder processing, the location of the most apical carrier band varied from the matched condition (i.e., 28 mm from the base of the cochlear) to a basal shift (i.e., 22 mm from the base) in a step size of 1 mm. Ten normal-hearing subjects participated in the 20-alternative forced-choice test, where the consonants were presented in a /Ca/ context. Shift of 3 mm or more caused the consonant recognition scores to decrease significantly. The effects of spectral resolution disappeared when the amount of shift reached >or=3 mm. Information transmitted for voicing and place of articulation varied with spectral shift and spectral resolution, while information transmitted for manner was affected only by spectral shift but not spectral resolution. Spectral shift has shown specific effects on the confusion patterns of the consonants. The direction of errors reversed as spectral shift increased and the patterns of reversal were consistent across channel conditions. Overall, transmission of the consonant features can be accounted for by the acoustic features of the speech signal.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20649234      PMCID: PMC2921437          DOI: 10.1121/1.3436558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; J Wygonski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Frequency-place compression and expansion in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition.

Authors:  Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Dead regions and pitch perception.

Authors:  Martina Huss; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency transposition around dead regions simulated with a noiseband vocoder.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II.

Authors:  M ter Keurs; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Adaptation to distorted frequency-to-place maps: implications of simulations in normal listeners for cochlear implants and electroacoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Andrew Faulkner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  7 in total

1.  Melody recognition in dichotic listening with or without frequency-place mismatch.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Li Xu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Speech Rate Normalization and Phonemic Boundary Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Accommodation of gender-related phonetic differences by listeners with cochlear implants and in a variety of vocoder simulations.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Word segmentation from noise-band vocoded speech.

Authors:  Tina M Grieco-Calub; Katherine M Simeon; Hillary E Snyder; Casey Lew-Williams
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Relationship between multipulse integration and speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Individual Variability in Recalibrating to Spectrally Shifted Speech: Implications for Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael L Smith; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Integration of acoustic and electric hearing is better in the same ear than across ears.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin; Xiaosong Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.