Literature DB >> 14605797

A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture.

J S Gregory1, D Testi, A Stewart, P E Undrill, D M Reid, R M Aspden.   

Abstract

The shape of the proximal femur has been demonstrated to be important in the occurrence of fractures of the femoral neck. Unfortunately, multiple geometric measurements frequently used to describe this shape are highly correlated. A new method, active shape modeling (ASM) has been developed to quantify the morphology of the femur. This describes the shape in terms of orthogonal modes of variation that, consequently, are all independent. To test this method, digitized standard pelvic radiographs were obtained from 26 women who had suffered a hip fracture and compared with images from 24 age-matched controls with no fracture. All subjects also had their bone mineral density (BMD) measured at five sites using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. An ASM was developed and principal components analysis used to identify the modes which best described the shape. Discriminant analysis was used to determine which variable, or combination of variables, was best able to discriminate between the groups. ASM alone correctly identified 74% of the individuals and placed them in the appropriate group. Only one of the BMD values (Ward's triangle) achieved a higher value (82%). A combination of Ward's triangle BMD and ASM improved the accuracy to 90%. Geometric variables used in this study were weaker, correctly classifying less than 60% of the study group. Logistic regression showed that after adjustment for age, body mass index, and BMD, the ASM data was still independently associated with hip fracture (odds ratio (OR)=1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 3.11). The odds ratio was calculated relative to a 10% increase in the probability of belonging to the fracture group. Though these initial results were obtained from a limited data set, this study shows that ASM may be a powerful method to help identify individuals at risk of a hip fracture in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14605797     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1451-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  11 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for hip fracture not related to bone mass and their therapeutic implications.

Authors:  B Allolio
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Geometry of proximal femur in the prediction of hip fracture in osteoporotic women.

Authors:  S Gnudi; C Ripamonti; G Gualtieri; N Malavolta
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Evaluation of image features and search strategies for segmentation of bone structures in radiographs using Active Shape Models.

Authors:  Gert Behiels; Frederik Maes; Dirk Vandermeulen; Paul Suetens
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Multicenter Project for Research in Osteoporosis.

Authors:  C G Alonso; M D Curiel; F H Carranza; R P Cano; A D Peréz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Bone density and bone turnover in patients with osteoarthritis and osteoporosis.

Authors:  A Stewart; A Black; S P Robins; D M Reid
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Femoral neck length and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  J Michelotti; J Clark
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Bone mass and structure at the hip in men and women over the age of 60 years.

Authors:  M Peacock; G Liu; M Carey; W Ambrosius; C H Turner; S Hui; C C Johnston
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; S R Cummings; D Black; L Palermo; C C Glüer; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Measurement of femoral geometry in type I and type II osteoporosis: differences in hip axis length consistent with heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S Boonen; R Koutri; J Dequeker; J Aerssens; G Lowet; J Nijs; G Verbeke; E Lesaffre; P Geusens
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Comparison of logistic and Bayesian classifiers for evaluating the risk of femoral neck fracture in osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  D Testi; A Cappello; L Chiari; M Viceconti; S Gnudi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.079

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Relationship between joint shape and the development of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Julie C Baker-LePain; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  The association of proximal femoral shape and incident radiographic hip OA in elderly women.

Authors:  J A Lynch; N Parimi; R K Chaganti; M C Nevitt; N E Lane
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  Expected frequency of biomechanically adverse values of proximal femur geometric variables for fracture risk in the East Slovak female population (epidemiological study).

Authors:  Jaroslava Wendlová
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-29

4.  Single-centre study of hip fractures in Prague, Czech Republic, 1997-2007.

Authors:  Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum; Jan Bartoníček; Daniel Ríha; Petr Waldauf; Valér Džupa
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Expected frequency of femoral neck fractures by fall in the osteoporotic and osteopenic East Slovak female population: Epidemiological study.

Authors:  Jaroslava Wendlova
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-08

6.  A genomewide scan for quantitative trait loci underlying areal bone size variation in 451 Caucasian families.

Authors:  H Shen; J-R Long; D-H Xiong; Y-F Guo; P Xiao; Y-Z Liu; L-J Zhao; Y-J Liu; H-Y Deng; J-L Li; R R Recker; H-W Deng
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 7.  Advances in bone imaging for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Judith E Adams
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 43.330

8.  Variant alleles of the Wnt antagonist FRZB are determinants of hip shape and modify the relationship between hip shape and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Julie C Baker-Lepain; John A Lynch; Neeta Parimi; Charles E McCulloch; Michael C Nevitt; Maripat Corr; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-05

Review 9.  Structural and functional maturation of distal femoral cartilage and bone during postnatal development and growth in humans and mice.

Authors:  Elaine F Chan; Ricky Harjanto; Hiroshi Asahara; Nozomu Inoue; Koichi Masuda; William D Bugbee; Gary S Firestein; Harish S Hosalkar; Martin K Lotz; Robert L Sah
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 10.  Computational anatomy in the study of bone structure.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Daniel P Nicolella
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.