Literature DB >> 20217082

Single-centre study of hip fractures in Prague, Czech Republic, 1997-2007.

Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum1, Jan Bartoníček, Daniel Ríha, Petr Waldauf, Valér Džupa.   

Abstract

This study examines the epidemiological data of patients with hip fractures from 1997-2007. Adult patients treated for hip fracture between the years 1997-2007 were included in the study. Retrospective statistical assessment of continually gathered data focussed on epidemiology and demographics. The study involved 3,683 patients (2,678 women and 1,005 men). Patients older than 70 years accounted for 82% of all cases. There were 2.7 times more women; in patients younger than 60 years men significantly outnumbered women (p < 0.001). The mean patient age was 77.9 years (SD ± 12.6; women, 80.3 years; men, 71.5 years). There was a slight increase in the average age in both sexes. Trochanteric fractures accounted for 54.7% and femoral neck fractures accounted for 45.3% of fractures. The ratio of men to women was the same in femoral neck (AO-31B) and trochanteric (AO-31A) fractures. The average year-to-year increase in the number of fractures was 5.9%. For femoral neck fractures (AO-31B), there was a statistically insignificant increase in the number of fractures (p = 0.63); for intertrochanteric factures (AO-31A3) there was a statistically insignificant decrease (p = 0.65). There was an increase in the number of hip fractures resulting in a significant increase in pertrochanteric fractures (AO-31A1+2) (p < 0.001). The ratio of trochanteric to neck fractures increased from 0.99 to 1.53. Continual monitoring of patients with hip fracture offers data which allows comparisons between regions and countries. There has been a continual increase in the number of patients with hip fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20217082      PMCID: PMC3066323          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-0984-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  42 in total

1.  A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors:  M CLEVELAND; D M BOSWORTH; F R THOMPSON; H J WILSON; T ISHIZUKA
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1959-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Mortality and causes of death among patients with isolated limb and pelvic fractures.

Authors:  D E Deakin; C Boulton; C G Moran
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Previous medical problems in 326 consecutive hip fracture patients.

Authors:  L Escobar; R Escobar; J Cordero-Ampuero
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 4.  Epidemiology of hip fractures.

Authors:  R G Cumming; M C Nevitt; S R Cummings
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Effect of sex and age on the ratio of cervical to trochanteric hip fracture. A meta-analysis of 16 reports on 36,451 cases.

Authors:  C Baudoin; P Fardellone; J L Sebert
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1993-12

6.  [Epidemiology of trochanteric femoral fractures over 2 decades (1972-1988)].

Authors:  A Lustenberger; R Ganz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  The incidence of hip fracture in Europe.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Risk of mortality following hip fracture in Japan.

Authors:  Yukiharu Hasegawa; Sadao Suzuki; Hans Wingstrand
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  J S Gregory; D Testi; A Stewart; P E Undrill; D M Reid; R M Aspden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Time trends and demography of mortality after fractured neck of femur in an English population, 1968-98: database study.

Authors:  Stephen E Roberts; Michael J Goldacre
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04
View more
  5 in total

1.  Prolonged pre-operative hospital stay as a predictive factor for early outcomes and mortality after geriatric hip fracture surgery: a single institution open prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Goran Tulic; Emilija Dubljanin-Raspopovic; Sanja Tomanovic-Vujadinovic; Jelena Sopta; Aleksandar Todorovic; Radovan Manojlovic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Subsequent contralateral hip fractures: can at-risk patients be identified? An observational study of 5,102 patients.

Authors:  Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum; Valér Džupa; Radek Bartoška; Daniel Říha; Petr Waldauf; Václav Báča
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The importance of intramedullary hip nail positioning during implantation for stable pertrochanteric fractures: biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Radek Bartoska; Vaclav Baca; Zdenek Horak; Maros Hrubina; Jiri Skala-Rosenbaum; Jiri Marvan; David Kachlik; Valer Dzupa
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Predicting discharge location of hip fracture patients; the new discharge of hip fracture patients score.

Authors:  Anne Jochem Hendrik Vochteloo; Wim Eduard Tuinebreijer; Andrea Britta Maier; Rob Gerardus Henricus Hubertus Nelissen; Rolf Melchior Bloem; Peter Pilot
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Strength Analyses of Screws for Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Karel Frydrýšek; Milan Šír; Leopold Pleva
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 1.553

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.