Literature DB >> 20812051

Expected frequency of femoral neck fractures by fall in the osteoporotic and osteopenic East Slovak female population: Epidemiological study.

Jaroslava Wendlova1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: To compare an expected frequency of pathological FSI values with an expected frequency of pathological BMD (T-score < or = -2.5 SD) in the total hip area in the East Slovak female population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the data in the sample of 3,215 East Slovak women with a primary or secondary osteopenia and osteoporosis and with risk factors for osteoporosis, aged 20-89 years, x = 58.9 years, 95% CI (55.15; 60.35). Measured variables: T-score total hip left and FSI left (femur strength index with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
RESULTS: In the East Slovak female population we can expect 6.25% of women with osteoporosis in the total hip area and 14.54% of women with FSI <1, i.e. these women will suffer a femoral neck fracture in case of a fall. The expected frequency of the incidence of pathological FSI values of the East Slovak female population is 2.33 times higher than the expected frequency of the incidence of pathological T-score for osteoporosis measured in the total hip area.
CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of FSI variable values may discover a higher percentage of women with a risk of femoral neck fracture by fall than the measurement of BMD variable values in the total hip area. This disproportion shows that even a patient with osteopenia measured in the total hip area may sustain a femoral neck fracture by fall, when she has adverse values of geometric variables of proximal femur (biomechanically unfavourable proximal femur configuration).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20812051     DOI: 10.1007/s10354-010-0779-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5341


  21 in total

1.  The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; B Jonsson; C de Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Femoral neck cortical geometry measured with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with proximal femur strength.

Authors:  S L Manske; T Liu-Ambrose; P M de Bakker; D Liu; S Kontulainen; P Guy; T R Oxland; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Why is it so important to balance the muscular dysbalance in mm. coxae area in osteoporotic patients?

Authors:  J Wendlova
Journal:  Bratisl Lek Listy       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.278

4.  Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions.

Authors:  Klaus Engelke; Judith E Adams; Gabriele Armbrecht; Peter Augat; Cesar E Bogado; Mary L Bouxsein; Dieter Felsenberg; Masako Ito; Sven Prevrhal; Didier B Hans; E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 5.  Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Authors:  Nelson B Watts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Predictive geometric factors in a standardized model of femoral neck fracture. Experimental study of cadaveric human femurs.

Authors:  C Kukla; C Gaebler; R W Pichl; R Prokesch; G Heinze; T Heinz
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  J S Gregory; D Testi; A Stewart; P E Undrill; D M Reid; R M Aspden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Differences in proximal femur geometry distinguish vertebral from femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic women.

Authors:  S Gnudi; N Malavolta; D Testi; M Viceconti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX).

Authors:  S Fujiwara; T Nakamura; H Orimo; T Hosoi; I Gorai; A Oden; H Johansson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  1 in total

1.  Expected frequency of biomechanically adverse values of proximal femur geometric variables for fracture risk in the East Slovak female population (epidemiological study).

Authors:  Jaroslava Wendlová
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.