Literature DB >> 23232496

Advances in bone imaging for osteoporosis.

Judith E Adams1.   

Abstract

The diagnosis and management of osteoporosis have been improved by the development of new quantitative methods of skeletal assessment and by the availability of an increasing number of therapeutic options, respectively. A number of imaging methods exist and all have advantages and disadvantages. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most widely available and commonly utilized method for clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis and will remain so for the foreseeable future. The WHO 10-year fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX(®)) will improve clinical use of DXA and the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic intervention. Improved reporting of radiographic features that suggest osteoporosis and the presence of vertebral fracture, which are powerful predictors of future fractures, could increase the frequency of appropriate DXA referrals. Quantitative CT remains predominantly a research tool, but has advantages over DXA--allowing measurement of volumetric density, separate measures of cortical and trabecular bone density, and evaluation of bone shape and size. High resolution imaging, using both CT and MRI, has been introduced to measure trabecular and cortical bone microstructure. Although these methods provide detailed insights into the effects of disease and therapies on bone, they are technically challenging and not widely available, so they are unlikely to be used in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23232496     DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol        ISSN: 1759-5029            Impact factor:   43.330


  151 in total

1.  Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques.

Authors:  C C Glüer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging of cortical bone.

Authors:  Jiang Du; Michael Carl; Mark Bydder; Atsushi Takahashi; Christine B Chung; Graeme M Bydder
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Texture analysis of X-ray radiographs of iliac bone is correlated with bone micro-CT.

Authors:  P Guggenbuhl; F Bodic; L Hamel; M F Baslé; D Chappard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Value of digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the assessment of inflammatory bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Glenn Haugeberg; Andreas Hansch; Diane M Renz; Gabriele Lehmann; Ansgar Malich; Gunter Wolf; Joachim Böttcher
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT).

Authors:  Valérie Danielle Bousson; Judith Adams; Klaus Engelke; Mounir Aout; Martine Cohen-Solal; Catherine Bergot; Didier Haguenauer; Daniele Goldberg; Karine Champion; Redha Aksouh; Eric Vicaut; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; C Bigelow; M Heimisdottir; S May; M Walker; J R Kirkwood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Noninvasive imaging of bone microarchitecture.

Authors:  Janina M Patsch; Andrew J Burghardt; Galateia Kazakia; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Official Positions for FRAX® Bone Mineral Density and FRAX® simplification from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX®.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Juliet E Compston; Paul D Miller; Jonathan D Adachi; Judith E Adams; William D Leslie; John A Kanis; Alireza Moayyeri; Robert A Adler; Didier B Hans; David L Kendler; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Marc-Antoine Krieg; Basel K Masri; Roman R Lorenc; Douglas C Bauer; Glen M Blake; Robert G Josse; Patricia Clark; Aliya A Khan
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  Automated evaluation of hip axis length for predicting hip fracture.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M McClung; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Ya-Ting Chen; Thomas A Abbott; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Paul D Miller; Lois E Wehren; Marc L Berger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24
View more
  37 in total

1.  Multi-frequency axial transmission bone ultrasonometer.

Authors:  Alexey Tatarinov; Vladimir Egorov; Noune Sarvazyan; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 2.  Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images.

Authors:  Dieter H Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  Finite element analysis of the hip and spine based on quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Dana Carpenter
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Dual-energy cone-beam CT with a flat-panel detector: effect of reconstruction algorithm on material classification.

Authors:  W Zbijewski; G J Gang; J Xu; A S Wang; J W Stayman; K Taguchi; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Technologies for assessment of bone reflecting bone strength and bone mineral density in elderly women: an update.

Authors:  Alvilde Dhainaut; Mari Hoff; Unni Syversen; Glenn Haugeberg
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22

Review 6.  Quantitative imaging methods in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ling Oei; Fjorda Koromani; Fernando Rivadeneira; M Carola Zillikens; Edwin H G Oei
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

Review 7.  Diagnostic imaging of osteoporosis and sarcopenia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Gabriele Maffi; Jacopo Antonino Vitale; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 8.  Osteoporosis: what the clinician needs to know?

Authors:  Rosario Francesco Balzano; Maria Mattera; Xiaoguang Cheng; Samantha Cornacchia; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

10.  Long-term experiment to study the development, interaction, and influencing factors of DEXA parameters.

Authors:  Helmut Fuchs; Christine Gau; Wolfgang Hans; Valerie Gailus-Durner; Martin Hrabě de Angelis
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.