Literature DB >> 23722733

Computational anatomy in the study of bone structure.

Julio Carballido-Gamio1, Daniel P Nicolella.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a major public health threat for millions of Americans with billions of dollars per year of national direct costs for osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis results in a decrease in overall bone mass and subsequent increase in the risk of bone fracture. Bone strength arises from the combination of bone size and shape, the distribution of bone mass throughout the structure, and the quality of the bone material. Advances in medical imaging have enabled a comprehensive assessment of bone structure through the analysis of high-resolution scans of relevant anatomical sites, eg, the proximal femur. However, conventional imaging analysis techniques use predefined regions of interest that do not take full advantage of such scans. Recently, computational anatomy, a set of imaging-based analysis algorithms, has emerged as a promising technique in studies of osteoporosis. Computational anatomy enables analyses that are not biased to one particular region and provide a more complete assessment of the whole structure. In this article, we review studies that have used computational anatomy to investigate the structure of the proximal femur in relation to age, fracture, osteoporotic treatment, and spaceflight effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23722733     DOI: 10.1007/s11914-013-0148-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep        ISSN: 1544-1873            Impact factor:   5.096


  42 in total

1.  Development of a parametric finite element model of the proximal femur using statistical shape and density modelling.

Authors:  Daniel P Nicolella; Todd L Bredbenner
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study--a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men.

Authors:  Eric Orwoll; Janet Babich Blank; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Jane Cauley; Steven Cummings; Kristine Ensrud; Cora Lewis; Peggy M Cawthon; Robert Marcus; Lynn M Marshall; Joan McGowan; Kathy Phipps; Sherry Sherman; Marcia L Stefanick; Katie Stone
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling.

Authors:  J H Keyak; S A Rossi; K A Jones; H B Skinner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone.

Authors:  T S Keller
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Cross-sectional study of osteopenia with quantitative MR imaging and bone densitometry.

Authors:  F W Wehrli; J A Hopkins; S N Hwang; H K Song; P J Snyder; J G Haddad
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models.

Authors:  Joyce H Keyak; Tadashi S Kaneko; Jamshid Tehranzadeh; Harry B Skinner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Assessment of the individual fracture risk of the proximal femur by using statistical appearance models.

Authors:  Benedikt Schuler; Karl D Fritscher; Volker Kuhn; Felix Eckstein; Thomas M Link; Rainer Schubert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The components of excess mortality after hip fracture.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; C De Laet; B Jonsson; A K Oglesby
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  J S Gregory; D Testi; A Stewart; P E Undrill; D M Reid; R M Aspden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Targeted regeneration of bone in the osteoporotic human femur.

Authors:  Kenneth E S Poole; Graham M Treece; Gerard R Ridgway; Paul M Mayhew; Jan Borggrefe; Andrew H Gee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Automatic multi-parametric quantification of the proximal femur with quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Serena Bonaretti; Isra Saeed; Roy Harnish; Robert Recker; Andrew J Burghardt; Joyce H Keyak; Tamara Harris; Sundeep Khosla; Thomas F Lang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-08

2.  Spatial Differences in the Distribution of Bone Between Femoral Neck and Trochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Aihong Yu; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Ling Wang; Thomas F Lang; Yongbin Su; Xinbao Wu; Manyi Wang; Jie Wei; Chen Yi; Xiaoguang Cheng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Physical Activity for Strengthening Fracture Prone Regions of the Proximal Femur.

Authors:  Robyn K Fuchs; Mariana E Kersh; Julio Carballido-Gamio; William R Thompson; Joyce H Keyak; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Hip Fracture Discrimination Based on Statistical Multi-parametric Modeling (SMPM).

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Aihong Yu; Ling Wang; Yongbin Su; Andrew J Burghardt; Thomas F Lang; Xiaoguang Cheng
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Fracture Prediction by Computed Tomography and Finite Element Analysis: Current and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Fjola Johannesdottir; Brett Allaire; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Focal osteoporosis defects play a key role in hip fracture.

Authors:  Kenneth E S Poole; Linda Skingle; Andrew H Gee; Thomas D Turmezei; Fjola Johannesdottir; Karen Blesic; Collette Rose; Madhavi Vindlacheruvu; Simon Donell; Jan Vaculik; Pavel Dungl; Martin Horak; Jan J Stepan; Jonathan Reeve; Graham M Treece
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 7.  Cortical Bone Mapping: Measurement and Statistical Analysis of Localised Skeletal Changes.

Authors:  Graham Treece; Andrew Gee
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Ricci-flow based conformal mapping of the proximal femur to identify exercise loading effects.

Authors:  Nathaniel Narra; Shinya Abe; Vassil Dimitrov; Riku Nikander; Reijo Kouhia; Harri Sievänen; Jari Hyttinen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.