Literature DB >> 8619371

Measurement of femoral geometry in type I and type II osteoporosis: differences in hip axis length consistent with heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fractures.

S Boonen1, R Koutri, J Dequeker, J Aerssens, G Lowet, J Nijs, G Verbeke, E Lesaffre, P Geusens.   

Abstract

The epidemiologic patterns of vertebral and femoral fractures are sufficiently different to suggest that they represent distinct disorders (type I versus type II osteoporosis) although osteopenia is common in both. To determine whether differences in femoral geometry, one of the main determinants of bone quality, might contribute to the heterogeneity in osteoporotic fractures, we obtained dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans on 210 women age 60 or older, including 105 type I fracture cases, 30 type II patients, and 75 controls. Hip axis length, measured on the scan printout, was significantly increased (p < 0.01) in hip fracture patients compared with women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, whereas femoral neck density (BMD) was equal in both groups. The best discrimination between both fracture types was obtained by a logistic regression model based on age and axis length. Adding BMD to the model did not improve the discriminative power (p = 0.67). These data provide further evidence that geometric characteristics may be implicated in hip fracture risk. Furthermore, these findings suggest that an increase in hip axis length may predispose osteopenic subjects to a femoral localization of fragility fractures, consistent with the postulated heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8619371     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650101210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of femoral morphology and bone mineral density between femoral neck fractures and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Nobuhiko Sugano; Masanobu Saito; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Proximal hip geometry is linked to several chromosomal regions: genome-wide linkage results from the Framingham Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  S Demissie; J Dupuis; L A Cupples; T J Beck; D P Kiel; D Karasik
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Bivariate linkage study of proximal hip geometry and body size indices: the Framingham study.

Authors:  D Karasik; J Dupuis; L A Cupples; T J Beck; M C Mahaney; L M Havill; D P Kiel; S Demissie
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  New laboratory tools in the assessment of bone quality.

Authors:  D Chappard; M F Baslé; E Legrand; M Audran
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Geometric characteristics of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  P Geusens
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Femoral neck geometry and hip fracture risk: the Geelong osteoporosis study.

Authors:  S El-Kaissi; J A Pasco; M J Henry; S Panahi; J G Nicholson; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Differences of bone mass and bone structure in osteopenic rat models caused by spinal cord injury and ovariectomy.

Authors:  S-D Jiang; C Shen; L-S Jiang; L-Y Dai
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Differences in hip axis and femoral neck length in premenopausal women of Polynesian, Asian and European origin.

Authors:  K Chin; M C Evans; J Cornish; T Cundy; I R Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  A biomechanical sorting of clinical risk factors affecting osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  J S Gregory; D Testi; A Stewart; P E Undrill; D M Reid; R M Aspden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.