Literature DB >> 9797907

Bone mass and structure at the hip in men and women over the age of 60 years.

M Peacock1, G Liu, M Carey, W Ambrosius, C H Turner, S Hui, C C Johnston.   

Abstract

Bone mass and structure at the proximal femur are important predictors of hip fracture. The aims of this study were to compare in a large sample of elderly men and women the precision of measurements of bone mass and structure at multiple sites at the proximal femur, to examine their interrelationships, to establish their relationships with age and body size, and to examine criteria for defining geometric and architectural variables in bone structure. Women (n = 336) and men (n = 141) over the age of 60 years were studied cross-sectionally. Bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) at the proximal femur were measured in duplicate by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Shaft and total upper femur (hip) sites in addition to femoral neck, Ward's triangle and trochanter were measured. Structural variables, measured from radiographs and from DXA images, including cortical thickness at calcar femorale, lateral cotex and midfemur, width of the femur and medulla, Singh grade, hip and femoral axis length, femoral head and neck width and the center of mass of the femoral neck. BMD and BMC had high reproducibility and there were significant differences in reproducibility across sites. Among sites, total upper femur and shaft had the highest reproducibility. Duplicate measurements substantially improved reliability of the measurement and are recommended when the value is close to a diagnostic level or when it will be used to establish rates of change. Reproducibility of structural variables was also high except for the lateral cortex, center of mass and Singh grade. Variance due to measurement error did not change with either age or gender. Women were significantly different from men, after controlling for differences in body size, in all variables except Singh grade and medulla width. BMD and BMC were negatively related to age and positively to body size. Structural variables examined in relation to age and body size fell into two categories. The first comprised variables that were not age-related but were body-size-related suggesting that they could be classified as geometric variables. The second comprised variables that were both body-size-related and age-related, suggesting that they could be classified as architectural variables. Using these criteria, calcar and lateral cortex were architectural variables, whereas shaft width, hip and femoral axis length, femoral head and neck width, and center of mass were geometric in both men and women. In women, shaft cortex width and medulla width were age-related, whereas in men they were not. Singh grade showed no consistent pattern with age or body size in women and men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9797907     DOI: 10.1007/s001980050059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  17 in total

1.  Sex-specific quantitative trait loci contribute to normal variation in bone structure at the proximal femur in men.

Authors:  Munro Peacock; Daniel L Koller; Dongbing Lai; Siu Hui; Tatiana Foroud; Michael J Econs
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Method for cortical bone structural analysis from magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Bryon R Gomberg; Punam K Saha; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Physical activity in the prevention and amelioration of osteoporosis in women : interaction of mechanical, hormonal and dietary factors.

Authors:  Katarina T Borer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Bone density, geometry, and fracture in elderly men.

Authors:  Pawel Szulc
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.

Authors:  Michael Tanzer; Stephen E Graves; Andrea Peng; Andrew J Shimmin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Two new regions of interest to evaluate separately cortical and trabecular BMD in the proximal femur using DXA.

Authors:  Sven Prevrhal; Margarita Meta; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  No difference in gender-specific hip replacement outcomes.

Authors:  Timothy Kostamo; Robert B Bourne; John Paul Whittaker; Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Use of DXA-based structural engineering models of the proximal femur to discriminate hip fracture.

Authors:  Lang Yang; Nicola Peel; Jackie A Clowes; Eugene V McCloskey; Richard Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Hip structural geometry in old and old-old age: similarities and differences between men and women.

Authors:  Laurel B Yates; David Karasik; Thomas J Beck; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  J S Gregory; D Testi; A Stewart; P E Undrill; D M Reid; R M Aspden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.