Literature DB >> 14526191

Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the prodisc total disc replacement.

Russel C Huang1, Federico P Girardi, Frank P Cammisa, Patrick Tropiano, Thierry Marnay.   

Abstract

The rationale for total disc replacement is avoidance of the junctional degeneration seen after arthrodesis by preservation of segmental motion. To justify the use of disc prostheses, it is essential to document maintained range of motion (ROM) and sagittal alignment at long-term follow-up. This is a retrospective radiographic study of 42 patients who had placement of 58 first-generation Prodisc prostheses at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. Flexion-extension ROM was measured by Cobb's method. Junctional levels were evaluated for junctional degeneration. Pre- and postoperative global and segmental lordosis were measured. Prognostic patient factors predicting ROM of <2 degrees were evaluated. We observed ROM of at least 2 degrees in 66% of Prodisc prostheses at 8.7-year follow-up, although ROM was less than that reported in asymptomatic normal individuals. Mean ROM for disc prostheses with motion was 7.5 degrees at L3-L4, 6.2 degrees at L4-L5, and 4.1 degrees at L5-S1. Mean ROM for all prostheses was 3.8 degrees. The incidence of radiographic junctional degeneration was 24%, although no patients required surgery for symptomatic junctional degeneration. Mean ROM of prostheses below a degenerated junctional disc was 1.6 degrees compared with 4.7 degrees below a normal junctional disc (P < 0.035). Females were 3.5 times more likely to have ROM of <2 degrees. This is the longest published follow-up study of a lumbar disc replacement. The data show that ROM is preserved at long-term follow-up in the majority of patients. Global and segmental sagittal alignment improve after surgery. Furthermore, there is an association between ROM of disc prostheses and the development of junctional degeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14526191     DOI: 10.1097/00024720-200310000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  24 in total

1.  Revision of a Charité artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charité artificial disc: case report and explant analysis.

Authors:  Thierry David
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Established technique or experimental procedure?].

Authors:  T L Schulte; V Bullmann; T Lerner; H F Halm; U Liljenqvist; L Hackenberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Lumbar disc arthroplasty: indications, biomechanics, types, and radiological criteria].

Authors:  A Baur-Melnyk; C Birkenmaier; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Karsten Wiechert; Mohamed F Khattab; Andreas Korge; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Thomas Zweig; Stephen Ferguson; Manuela T Raimondi; Claudio Lamartina; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Dynamics of an intervertebral disc prosthesis in human cadaveric spines.

Authors:  Kathleen N Meyers; Deirdre A Campbell; Joseph D Lipman; Kai Zhang; Elizabeth R Myers; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-09

7.  Radiographic total disc replacement angle measurement accuracy using the Oxford Cobbometer: precision and bias.

Authors:  Victor Kosmopoulos; Kosmas Stafylas; John McManus; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Consequences of patient position in the radiographic measurement of artificial disc replacement angles.

Authors:  Victor Kosmopoulos; John McManus; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine.

Authors:  Gregory G Knapik; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  [Current short- and long-term results of lumbar disc replacement : update 2008].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; V Ewerbeck; A J Suda; C Carstens
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.