Literature DB >> 16708201

[Lumbar disc arthroplasty: indications, biomechanics, types, and radiological criteria].

A Baur-Melnyk1, C Birkenmaier, M F Reiser.   

Abstract

Lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) was developed to treat a painful degenerative lumbar motion segment while avoiding the disadvantages of fusion surgery, such as adjacent segment instabilities. Early clinical results with TDR have shown a significant reduction in low back pain and a significant improvement in disability scores. When compared to fusion, the results with TDR tend to be superior in the short-term follow-up and initial rehabilitation is faster. The radiological assessment is an integral part of the preoperative work-up. Plain X-rays of the lumbar spine should be complemented by flexion - extension views in order to assess residual segmental mobility. Computed tomography is used to exclude osteoarthritis of the zygapophyseal joints, Baastrup's disease (kissing spines) and other sources of low back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging is useful to exclude substantial disc protrusions; it allows for the detection of disc dehydration and bone marrow edema in the case of activated spondylochondrosis. If osteoporosis is suspected, an osteodensitometry of the lumbar spine should be performed. Postoperative plain X-rays should include antero-posterior and lateral views as well as flexion - extension views in the later postoperative course. Measurements should determine the disc space height in the lateral view, the segmental and total lumbar lordosis as well as the segmental mobility in the flexion - extension views. The ideal position of a TDR is exactly central in the ap-view and close to the dorsal border of the vertebral endplates in the lateral view. Malpositioning may cause segmental hyperlordosis and unbalanced loading of the endplates with the risk of implant subsidence and migration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16708201     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-006-1356-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  27 in total

1.  Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  H M Mayer; K Wiechert; A Korge; I Qose
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year.

Authors:  Patrick Tropiano; Russel C Huang; Federico P Girardi; Thierry Marnay
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-08

3.  [Disc replacement with the SB Charité endoposthesis - experience, preliminary results and comments after 35 prospectively performed operations].

Authors:  C Hopf; H Heeckt; C Beske
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct

Review 4.  Assessing the potential impact of total disc arthroplasty on surgeon practice patterns in North America.

Authors:  Kern Singh; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  A prospective morphological study of facet joint integrity following intervertebral disc replacement with the CHARITE Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Hans Trouillier; P Kern; H J Refior; M Müller-Gerbl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; H Mathews; Y Basso; S Aunoble; D Hoste; B Bley; T Friesem
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Rudolf Bertagnoli; James J Yue; Rahul V Shah; Regina Nanieva; Frank Pfeiffer; Andrea Fenk-Mayer; Trace Kershaw; Daniel S Husted
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Lumbar discography: a comprehensive review of outcome studies, diagnostic accuracy, and principles.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen; Thomas M Larkin; Steven A Barna; William E Palmer; Andrew C Hecht; Milan P Stojanovic
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

9.  The impact of total lumbar disc replacement on segmental and total lumbar lordosis.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Wolfram Käfer; Wolfhart Puhl; René Schmidt
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Scott Blumenthal; Paul C McAfee; Richard D Guyer; Stephen H Hochschuler; Fred H Geisler; Richard T Holt; Rolando Garcia; John J Regan; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses.

Authors:  E Schluessmann; P Diel; E Aghayev; T Zweig; P Moulin; C Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

3.  Spine imaging after lumbar disc replacement: pitfalls and current recommendations.

Authors:  Yohan Robinson; Bengt Sandén
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2009-07-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.