Literature DB >> 18751788

Dynamics of an intervertebral disc prosthesis in human cadaveric spines.

Kathleen N Meyers1, Deirdre A Campbell, Joseph D Lipman, Kai Zhang, Elizabeth R Myers, Federico P Girardi, Frank P Cammisa, Timothy M Wright.   

Abstract

Low-back pain is a common, disabling medical condition, and one of the major causes is disc degeneration. Total disc replacements are intended to treat back pain by restoring disc height and re-establishing functional motion and stability at the index level. The objective of this study was to determine the effect on range of motion (ROM) and stiffness after implantation of the ProDisc-L device in comparison to the intact state. Twelve L5-S1 lumbar spine segments were tested in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation with axial compressive loads of 600 N and 1,200 N. Specimens were tested in the intact state and after implantation with the ProDisc-L device. ROM was not significantly different in the implanted spines when compared to their intact state in flexion/extension and axial rotation but increased in lateral bending. Increased compressive load did not affect ROM in flexion/extension or axial rotation but did result in decreased ROM in lateral bending and increased stiffness in both intact and implanted spine segments. The ProDisc-L successfully restored or maintained normal spine segment motion.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18751788      PMCID: PMC2504266          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-007-9049-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  28 in total

1.  Effect of compressive follower preload on the flexion-extension response of the human lumbar spine.

Authors:  Avinash G Patwardhan; Robert M Havey; Gerard Carandang; James Simonds; Leonard I Voronov; Alexander J Ghanayem; Kevin P Meade; Thomas M Gavin; Odysseas Paxinos
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Physiological axial compressive preloads increase motion segment stiffness, linearity and hysteresis in all six degrees of freedom for small displacements about the neutral posture.

Authors:  Mack G Gardner-Morse; Ian A Stokes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.

Authors:  Bryan W Cunningham; Jeffrey D Gordon; Anton E Dmitriev; Nianbin Hu; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Structural behavior of human lumbar spinal motion segments.

Authors:  Mack G Gardner-Morse; Ian A F Stokes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications.

Authors:  Rudolf Bertagnoli; Selva Kumar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  M N Kumar; A Baklanov; D Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Degenerative disc disease treated with combined anterior and posterior arthrodesis and posterior instrumentation.

Authors:  Kathleen R Moore; Manuel R Pinto; Lisa M Butler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial.

Authors:  Rick B Delamarter; David M Fribourg; Linda E A Kanim; Hyun Bae
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the prodisc total disc replacement.

Authors:  Russel C Huang; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa; Patrick Tropiano; Thierry Marnay
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-10

10.  The prevalence of disc aging and back pain after fusion extending into the lower lumbar spine. A matched MR study twenty-five years after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  A J Danielsson; C G Cederlund; S Ekholm; A L Nachemson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analyses comparing spine simulators with cadavers and finite element models by analysing range-of-motion data before and after lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Tobias Bohn; Susanne A J Lang; Stephanie Roll; Helene Schrader; Matthias Pumberger; Karin Büttner-Janz
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 10.479

2.  Dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total disc replacement using a pendulum testing system.

Authors:  Alan H Daniels; David J Paller; Sarath Koruprolu; Matthew McDonnell; Mark A Palumbo; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Biomechanical effects of semi-constrained integrated artificial discs on zygapophysial joints of implanted lumbar segments.

Authors:  Sheng-Nai Zheng; Qing-Qiang Yao; Li-Ming Wang; Wen-Hao Hu; Bo Wei; Yan Xu; Dong-Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 2.447

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.