Literature DB >> 17205239

Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance.

Christoph J Siepe1, Karsten Wiechert, Mohamed F Khattab, Andreas Korge, H Michael Mayer.   

Abstract

Despite the increasing popularity of total lumbar disc replacement (TDR) in predominantly young and active patients, no previous study has addressed possibilities, limitations and potential risks regarding athletic performance following TDR. Mechanical concerns remain and the implant's resilience as regards its load-bearing capacity during sporting activities is unknown. Thirty-nine athletic patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this study. These patients participated in a large variety of different types of sport. Significant and lasting pain-relief was attained following TDR with a mean follow-up of 26.3 months (range 9-50.7 months; FU rate 97.4%). Sporting activity was resumed within the first 3 months (38.5%) to 6 months (30.7%) with peak performance being reached after 5.2 months. Thirty-seven patients (94.9%) achieved resumption of sporting activity. Athletic performance improved significantly in 33 patients (84.6%). Minor subsidence was observed in 13 patients (30%) within the first 3 months with no further implant migration thereafter in 12 patients. Participation in all types of sport recorded in this study was accessible for a high rate of patients up to the level of professional athletes as well as those participating in extreme sports. Preoperative participation in sport proved to be a strong positive predictor for highly satisfactory postoperative outcome following TDR. In a selected group of patients, however, preoperative inability to participate in sporting activities did not impair postoperative physical activity. Due to the young age of the patients and significant load increase exerted during athletic activities, persisting concerns regarding the future behaviour of the implant remain and will require longer follow-up, modified investigation techniques and larger patient cohorts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17205239      PMCID: PMC2219656          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0257-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  55 in total

Review 1.  Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  M de Kleuver; F C Oner; W C H Jacobs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Functional radiographic diagnosis of the lumbar spine. Flexion-extension and lateral bending.

Authors:  J Dvorák; M M Panjabi; D G Chang; R Theiler; D Grob
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Wolfhart Puhl; René Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Point of view: Commentary on the research reports that led to Food and Drug Administration approval of an artificial disc.

Authors:  Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Lumbar spine loads during the lifting of extremely heavy weights.

Authors:  J Cholewicki; S M McGill; R W Norman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Rudolf Bertagnoli; James J Yue; Rahul V Shah; Regina Nanieva; Frank Pfeiffer; Andrea Fenk-Mayer; Trace Kershaw; Daniel S Husted
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Lumbar spine loading during half-squat exercises.

Authors:  A Cappozzo; F Felici; F Figura; F Gazzani
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Discographic pain report. Influence of psychological factors.

Authors:  A R Block; H Vanharanta; D D Ohnmeiss; R D Guyer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Low back pain among endurance athletes with and without specific back loading--a cross-sectional survey of cross-country skiers, rowers, orienteerers, and nonathletic controls.

Authors:  Roald Bahr; Stig Ove Andersen; Sverre Løken; Bjørn Fossan; Torger Hansen; Ingar Holme
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Low-back pain in athletes.

Authors:  Christopher M Bono
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2009.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Keel-based lumbar total disk replacement: Prodisc-L and Prodisc-O].

Authors:  Michael Ogon; Alexander Tuschel
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 3.  Spinal Injuries in the Overhead Athlete.

Authors:  Robert G Watkins; David Chang; Robert G Watkins
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-09-29

4.  [Current short- and long-term results of lumbar disc replacement : update 2008].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; V Ewerbeck; A J Suda; C Carstens
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Analysis of post-operative pain patterns following total lumbar disc replacement: results from fluoroscopically guided spine infiltrations.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Andreas Korge; Frank Grochulla; Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  The LP-ESP(®) lumbar disc prosthesis with 6 degrees of freedom: development and 7 years of clinical experience.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Lazennec; Alain Aaron; Adrien Brusson; Jean-Patrick Rakover; Marc-Antoine Rousseau
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-01-11

8.  Does vertebral endplate morphology influence outcomes in lumbar disc arthroplasty? Part I: an initial assessment of a novel classification system of lumbar endplate morphology.

Authors:  James J Yue; Matthew E Oetgen; Jorge J Jaramillo-de la Torre; Rudolf Bertagnoli
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-03-01

Review 9.  Spine surgery in athletes with low back pain-considerations for management and treatment.

Authors:  Robert J Burgmeier; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2014-11-10

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of a spherical lumbar interbody device at varying levels of subsidence.

Authors:  Steven A Rundell; Jorge E Isaza; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.