Literature DB >> 15672241

Revision of a Charité artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charité artificial disc: case report and explant analysis.

Thierry David1.   

Abstract

This report describes a case of one-level total disc replacement (TDR) of L5-S1 requiring revision at 9.5 years following the index surgery due to polyethylene failure caused by high oxidation. Primary revision strategies for TDR include instrumented posterolateral fusion, or 360 degrees fusion with replacement of the prosthesis with cages or allograft bone. A revision of a TDR with a similar prosthesis has not been described in the literature. An active 42-year-old female underwent TDR with a Charité artificial disc. She remained active and pain free for 9.5 years before presenting with moderate low-back pain and sciatica. Radiographic studies confirmed a fragmented polyethylene core. The failed prosthesis was revised to a new Charité disc with the patient again active and pain free for 6 months following surgery. Chemical and physical analysis of the core indicated high oxidation due to gamma sterilization in air; a process changed to gamma sterilization in nitrogen in 1998 to meet industry standards. No evidence of wear debris was noted. Revision of an artificial disc with an artificial disc can be performed safely and adequately with the Charité disc prosthesis as an alternative to fusion necessitated by a device failure. An anterior revision approach carries significant risk and should only be performed by surgeons experienced in anterior lumbar surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15672241      PMCID: PMC3454668          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0842-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  5 in total

1.  Current sterilization and packaging methods for polyethylene.

Authors:  L S Bargmann; B C Bargmann; J P Collier; B H Currier; M B Mayor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Mobile-bearing knee replacement: clinical results: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.

Authors:  Bryan W Cunningham; Jeffrey D Gordon; Anton E Dmitriev; Nianbin Hu; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the prodisc total disc replacement.

Authors:  Russel C Huang; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa; Patrick Tropiano; Thierry Marnay
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-10

5.  Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charité disc.

Authors:  André van Ooij; F Cumhur Oner; Ab J Verbout
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-08
  5 in total
  18 in total

1.  Preferential superior surface motion in wear simulations of the Charité total disc replacement.

Authors:  Curtis M Goreham-Voss; Rachel Vicars; Richard M Hall; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical changes of the lumbar segment after total disc replacement : charite(r), prodisc(r) and maverick(r) using finite element model study.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Sang-Hun Lee; Kyung-Soo Suk; Jung-Hee Lee; Bi-O Jeong
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-06-30

3.  Letter to the Editor concerning "Charité total disc replacement: clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years" (M. Putzier et al.).

Authors:  Karin Büttner-Janz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Thomas Zweig; Stephen Ferguson; Manuela T Raimondi; Claudio Lamartina; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael A Finn; Darrel S Brodke; Michael Daubs; Alpesh Patel; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Which design and biomaterial factors affect clinical wear performance of total disc replacements? A systematic review.

Authors:  Sai Y Veruva; Marla J Steinbeck; Jeffrey Toth; Dominik D Alexander; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Analysis of intraoperative difficulties and management of operative complications in revision anterior exposure of the lumbar spine: a report of 25 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; William Delblond; Alexandre Poignard; Jérôme Allain
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Biotribological evaluation of artificial disc arthroplasty devices: influence of loading and kinematic patterns during in vitro wear simulation.

Authors:  Thomas M Grupp; James J Yue; Rolando Garcia; Janet Basson; Jens Schwiesau; Bernhard Fritz; Wilhelm Blömer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison of single-level L4-L5 versus L5-S1 lumbar disc replacement: results and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Riccardo Sinigaglia; Albert Bundy; Sandro Costantini; Ugo Nena; Francesco Finocchiaro; Daniele A Fabris Monterumici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Spine imaging after lumbar disc replacement: pitfalls and current recommendations.

Authors:  Yohan Robinson; Bengt Sandén
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2009-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.