Literature DB >> 18818895

[Current short- and long-term results of lumbar disc replacement : update 2008].

B Wiedenhöfer1, V Ewerbeck, A J Suda, C Carstens.   

Abstract

Lumbar total disc replacement is an increasingly common way of treating degenerative lumbar disc disease while preserving mobility. The aim of this analysis was to survey evidence-based data to classify the procedure. Based on a MEDLINE inquiry, 38 clinical trials dealing with lumbar total disc replacement were selected and analyzed by the criteria of indication, preoperative procedure, and clinical follow-up. These data represent 3,180 patient-related evaluations with follow-up of 5.9 to 204 months. We also included ten retrospective studies. Patient satisfaction was a mean of 90.73%, and the Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale were significantly lower. High rates of revision surgery, explantation surgery, and secondary fusions are linked to wrong preoperative indication. According to evidence criteria, the results show that lumbar total disc replacement is a safe procedure with a high rate of success. There is clear evidence that both imprecise indication and the choice of too-small implants significantly reduce the prospect of surgical success and increase the rates of reintervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18818895     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-008-1519-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  44 in total

1.  Guide to development of practice guidelines.

Authors:  M A Kish
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  H M Mayer; K Wiechert; A Korge; I Qose
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Prospective study evaluating total disc replacement: preliminary results.

Authors:  Scott L Blumenthal; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Richard D Guyer; Stephen H Hochschuler
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-10

4.  Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; H Mathews; Y Basso; S Aunoble; D Hoste; B Bley; T Friesem
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 5.  Clinical results of ProDisc-II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States clinical trial.

Authors:  Rick B Delamarter; Hyun W Bae; Ben B Pradhan
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Prevalence of heterotopic ossification following total disc replacement. A prospective, randomized study of two hundred and seventy-six patients.

Authors:  P Justin Tortolani; Bryan W Cunningham; Mmech Eng; Paul C McAfee; Gwen A Holsapple; Karen A Adams
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Rudolf Bertagnoli; James J Yue; Rahul V Shah; Regina Nanieva; Frank Pfeiffer; Andrea Fenk-Mayer; Trace Kershaw; Daniel S Husted
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Rudolf Bertagnoli; James J Yue; Rahul V Shah; Regina Nanieva; Frank Pfeiffer; Andrea Fenk-Mayer; Trace Kershaw; Daniel S Husted
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period.

Authors:  Rudolf Bertagnoli; James J Yue; Regina Nanieva; Andrea Fenk-Mayer; Daniel S Husted; Rahul V Shah; John W Emerson
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-02

10.  Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability.

Authors:  S Etebar; D W Cahill
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  3 in total

1.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

2.  Impact of total disc arthroplasty on the surgical management of lumbar degenerative disc disease: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2000 to 2008.

Authors:  Olatilewa O Awe; Mitchel G Maltenfort; Srinivas Prasad; James S Harrop; John K Ratliff
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-10-12

3.  The Effectiveness and Safety of Utilizing Mobile Phone-Based Programs for Rehabilitation After Lumbar Spinal Surgery: Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jingyi Hou; Rui Yang; Yanfeng Wu; Huiyong Shen; Yaping Yang; Yiyong Tang; Haiquan Deng; Zhong Chen
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.773

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.