Literature DB >> 18496719

Radiographic total disc replacement angle measurement accuracy using the Oxford Cobbometer: precision and bias.

Victor Kosmopoulos1, Kosmas Stafylas, John McManus, Constantin Schizas.   

Abstract

Total disc replacement (TDR) clinical success has been reported to be related to the residual motion of the operated level. Thus, accurate measurement of TDR range of motion (ROM) is of utmost importance. One commonly used tool in measuring ROM is the Oxford Cobbometer. Little is known however on its accuracy (precision and bias) in measuring TDR angles. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the Cobbometer to accurately measure radiographic TDR angles. An anatomically accurate synthetic L4-L5 motion segment was instrumented with a CHARITE artificial disc. The TDR angle and anatomical position between L4 and L5 was fixed to prohibit motion while the motion segment was radiographically imaged in various degrees of rotation and elevation, representing a sample of possible patient placement positions. An experienced observer made ten readings of the TDR angle using the Cobbometer at each different position. The Cobbometer readings were analyzed to determine measurement accuracy at each position. Furthermore, analysis of variance was used to study rotation and elevation of the motion segment as treatment factors. Cobbometer TDR angle measurements were most accurate (highest precision and lowest bias) at the centered position (95.5%), which placed the TDR directly inline with the x-ray beam source without any rotation. In contrast, the lowest accuracy (75.2%) was observed in the most rotated and off-centered view. A difference as high as 4 degrees between readings at any individual position, and as high as 6 degrees between all the positions was observed. Furthermore, the Cobbometer was unable to detect the expected trend in TDR angle projection with changing position. Although the Cobbometer has been reported to be reliable in different clinical applications, it lacks the needed accuracy to measure TDR angles and ROM. More accurate ROM measurement methods need to be developed to help surgeons and researchers assess radiological success of TDRs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18496719      PMCID: PMC2518759          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0686-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

1.  Roentgen single-plane photogrammetric analysis (RSPA.) A new approach to the study of musculoskeletal movement.

Authors:  X Yuan; L Ryd; K E Tanner; L Lidgren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-08

2.  Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Wolfhart Puhl; René Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  In vivo study of the kinematics in axial rotation of the lumbar spine after total intervertebral disc replacement: long-term results: a 10-14 years follow up evaluation.

Authors:  El-hadi SariAli; Jean Philippe Lemaire; Hugues Pascal-Mousselard; Hélène Carrier; Waffa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A radiostereometric analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Bengt Lind; Björn Zoëga; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Consequences of patient position in the radiographic measurement of artificial disc replacement angles.

Authors:  Victor Kosmopoulos; John McManus; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Measurement of thoracic and lumbar fracture kyphosis: evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability.

Authors:  T R Kuklo; D W Polly; B D Owens; S M Zeidman; A S Chang; W R Klemme
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Paul C McAfee; Bryan Cunningham; Gwen Holsapple; Karen Adams; Scott Blumenthal; Richard D Guyer; Anton Dmietriev; James H Maxwell; John J Regan; Jorge Isaza
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Brian J C Freeman; James Davenport
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Russel C Huang; Patrick Tropiano; Thierry Marnay; Federico P Girardi; Moe R Lim; Frank P Cammisa
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Validation of a low-dose hybrid RSA and fluoroscopy technique: Determination of accuracy, bias and precision.

Authors:  James Ioppolo; Niclas Börlin; Charles Bragdon; Mingguo Li; Roger Price; David Wood; Henrik Malchau; Bo Nivbrant
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  1 in total

1.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.