Literature DB >> 1415856

Trends in obstetric operative procedures, 1980 to 1987.

S C Zahniser1, J S Kendrick, A L Franks, A F Saftlas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Increasing rates of cesarean deliveries have received widespread attention in recent years, as concern in the United States about unnecessary surgical procedures has increased. However, little information has been published on the national trends of other operative obstetric procedures occurring during deliveries.
METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey to examine trends in the use of forceps, vacuum extraction, and cesarean section from 1980 through 1987.
RESULTS: The rate of cesarean sections increased by 48%, while the rate of forceps procedures declined by 43%. Although the risk of cesarean section was significantly increased for older women, the risk of forceps and vacuum extraction procedures did not vary by age. Women with private insurance were significantly more likely to receive a cesarean section (rate ratio [RR] = 1.2), forceps procedure (RR = 1.7), and vacuum extraction procedure (RR = 1.8) than were women without private insurance.
CONCLUSIONS: As pressure mounts to decrease the national cesarean section rate from 24% to 15% by the year 2000, attention should also be given to surveillance of other operative delivery procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1415856      PMCID: PMC1695853          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.82.10.1340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  19 in total

1.  1989 U.S. cesarean section rate steadies--VBAC rate rises to nearly one in five.

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek; M Moien; C L Kosary
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.689

2.  Alternative strategies for controlling rising cesarean section rates.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  International differences in the use of obstetric interventions.

Authors:  F C Notzon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-06-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Surgical and nonsurgical procedures associated with hospital delivery in the United States: 1980-1987.

Authors:  L J Kozak
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Recent trends in cesarean birth and trial of labor rates in the United States.

Authors:  P H Shiono; J G Fielden; D McNellis; G G Rhoads; W H Pearse
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987 Jan 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Reducing cesarean sections at a teaching hospital.

Authors:  L Sanchez-Ramos; A M Kaunitz; H B Peterson; B Martinez-Schnell; R J Thompson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Delayed childbearing and the outcome of pregnancy.

Authors:  G S Berkowitz; M L Skovron; R H Lapinski; R L Berkowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-03-08       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.

Authors:  J B Gould; B Davey; R S Stafford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Pregnancy outcomes in black women aged 35 and older.

Authors:  D A Grimes; G K Gross
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  13 in total

1.  Caesarian sections in Guadalajara, Mexico: sociodemographic risk factors.

Authors:  G J Gonzalez-Perez; M G Vega-Lopez
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study.

Authors:  Nivedita Gauthaman; Denise Henry; Irina Chis Ster; Azar Khunda; Stergios K Doumouchtsis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Practice variation in the use of interventions in high-risk obstetrics.

Authors:  J M Bronstein; S P Cliver; R L Goldenberg
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Socioeconomic and racial differences in obstetric procedures.

Authors:  A Leyland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Analyzing socioeconomic and racial/ethnic patterns in health and health care.

Authors:  N Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Cesarean section rates in Italy.

Authors:  C Signorelli; M S Cattaruzza
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Predictors of cesarean section delivery among college-educated black and white women, Davidson County, Tennessee, 1990-1994.

Authors:  A O Scott-Wright; T M Flanagan; R M Wrona
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Does pet-keeping modify the association of delivery mode with offspring body size?

Authors:  Andrea E Cassidy-Bushrow; Ganesa Wegienka; Suzanne Havstad; Albert M Levin; Susan V Lynch; Dennis R Ownby; Andrew G Rundle; Kimberley J Woodcroft; Edward M Zoratti; Christine Cole Johnson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-06

9.  Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; S A Dobie; L G Hart; R Schneeweiss; D Gould; T R Raine; T J Benedetti; M J Pirani; E B Perrin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Racial/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery, California.

Authors:  P Braveman; S Egerter; F Edmonston; M Verdon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.