Literature DB >> 25990206

Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study.

Nivedita Gauthaman1, Denise Henry2, Irina Chis Ster3, Azar Khunda4, Stergios K Doumouchtsis2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Rotational instrumental deliveries are thought to carry additional risks compared with non-rotational instrumental deliveries, including trauma to maternal tissues, and require specific expertise and training. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the association between the type of forceps delivery and maternal perineal trauma, and in particular to investigate if Kielland's rotational forceps delivery increases obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).
METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of 1,515 women who attended a tertiary maternity unit over a period of 5 years and had operative vaginal deliveries primarily or completed by forceps. Data were obtained through the hospital's maternity reporting system. The severity of maternal perineal trauma, particularly third and fourth-degree tears in relation to the type of forceps delivery was explored. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate the crude and the adjusted relative risks (RR) of sustaining third-degree tears compared with other types of vaginal tears. Univariate analyses explored the crude associations between relative risks and age, ethnicity, birth weight, type of instrumental delivery and operator's experience. A multivariate multinomial logistic regression model estimated the adjusted relative risks and included all the previous variables as independent covariates.
RESULTS: Of the 1,492 women included in the study, 150 women (77 %) had sustained category 1 tears, 63 women (4 %) had sustained category 2 tears and 279 women (19 %) had sustained third-degree tears. There was no statistically significant association between the severity of maternal perineal trauma and the type of forceps delivery (failed ventouse vs Kielland's forceps RR 1.52, p = 0.159 CI 0.84-2.72, Wrigleys vs Kielland's RR 0.59, p = 0.249, CI 0.24-1.43; Andersons vs Kielland's RR 1.16, p = 0.603, CI 0.65-2.05) after adjusting for age, birth weight, BMI, ethnicity and operator experience (full list of covariates not included).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of third- and fourth-degree tears following rotational Kielland's forceps delivery and other non-rotational forceps deliveries is comparable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kielland’s forceps; Rotational forceps delivery; Third-degree tears

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25990206     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2717-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  26 in total

1.  The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.

Authors:  C Gardella; M Taylor; T Benedetti; J Hitti; C Critchlow
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  In praise of Kielland's forceps.

Authors:  Karl S Oláh
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  A matched controlled study of Kielland's forceps for transverse arrest of the fetal vertex.

Authors:  E Schiff; S A Friedman; M Zolti; A Avraham; Z Kayam; S Mashiach; H Carp
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery.

Authors:  Raya Al-Suhel; Simmerjyot Gill; Stephen Robson; Bruce Shadbolt
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.100

5.  An analysis of recent trends in vacuum extraction and forceps delivery in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  G I Meniru
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-02

6.  An Australian prospective cohort study of risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth.

Authors:  Hannah G Dahlen; Maureen Ryan; Caroline S E Homer; Margaret Cooke
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 7.  Rotational forceps: should these procedures be abandoned?

Authors:  Joong Shin Park; Julian N Robinson; Errol R Norwitz
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.300

8.  Perineal body length and lacerations at delivery.

Authors:  Shad H Deering; Nicole Carlson; Michael Stitely; Alexander D Allaire; Andrew J Satin
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.142

9.  Trends in obstetric operative procedures, 1980 to 1987.

Authors:  S C Zahniser; J S Kendrick; A L Franks; A F Saftlas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes of successful Kielland's rotational forceps delivery.

Authors:  Sarah J Stock; Katherine Josephs; Sarah Farquharson; Corinne Love; Sarah E Cooper; Chris Kissack; Ranjit Akolekar; Jane E Norman; Fiona C Denison
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  2 in total

1.  Residual defects after repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries and pelvic floor muscle strength are related to anal incontinence symptoms.

Authors:  Cristina Ros Cerro; Eva Martínez Franco; Giulio Aniello Santoro; Maria José Palau; Pawel Wieczorek; Montserrat Espuña-Pons
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Incidence and Risk Factors of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries after Various Modes of Vaginal Deliveries in Chinese Women.

Authors:  Chi Wai Tung; Willy Cecilia Cheon; Wai Mei Anny Tong; Hau Yee Leung
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.