Literature DB >> 3795432

Recent trends in cesarean birth and trial of labor rates in the United States.

P H Shiono, J G Fielden, D McNellis, G G Rhoads, W H Pearse.   

Abstract

A national probability survey was conducted to evaluate changes since 1979 in cesarean delivery and trial of labor rates after a previous cesarean delivery. Questionnaires were mailed to 538 hospitals and 87% responded. In 1979, of women with a prior cesarean birth 2.1% (+/- 0.3%) were given a trial of labor. By 1984, the rate increased fourfold to 8.0% (+/- 0.7%). Trials of labor increased dramatically with the size of the delivery service. The rates ranged from 2% in smaller hospitals to 25% in larger hospitals. More than 50% of the trials of labor were successful. However, the fraction of hospitals with no trials of labor remains high (54%). Cesarean birth rates increased from 14.1% (+/- 0.1%) in 1979 to 19.0% (+/- 0.2) in 1984. Hospitals with fewer births had a larger variation in cesarean birth rates; the fifth and 95th percentiles were 5% and 33%, respectively, for hospitals with fewer than 500 deliveries per year, and 14% and 31% for hospitals with 1000 deliveries or more per year. Fetal distress accounted for a larger proportion of primary cesarean deliveries in 1984 (21%) compared with 1979 (14%). The observed increase in the rate of trial of labor does not seem to be large enough to stem the rising cesarean delivery rate. This survey and other national surveys provide no evidence that the cesarean delivery rates are leveling off or decreasing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3795432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  10 in total

1.  An audit of distribution and use of guidelines for management of head injury.

Authors:  R Madhok; R G Thomson; A Mordue; A D Mendelow; J Barker
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-03

2.  The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.

Authors:  D M Oleske; G L Glandon; G J Giacomelli; S F Hohmann
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Short-term impact of the European Consensus Conference on the use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract with antibiotics in ICU patients.

Authors:  B Misset; A Artigas; D Bihari; J Carlet; A Durocher; M Hemmer; M Langer; F Nicolas; P de Rohan-Chabot; H P Schuster; A Tensillon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise.

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek; T Liss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Holding back the tide of caesareans.

Authors:  J Lomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-09-03

6.  Malpractice premiums and primary cesarean section rates in New York and Illinois.

Authors:  S M Rock
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the 1980s.

Authors:  P J Placek; S M Taffel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Trends in obstetric operative procedures, 1980 to 1987.

Authors:  S C Zahniser; J S Kendrick; A L Franks; A F Saftlas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  A five-year survey of caesarean delivery at a Nigerian tertiary hospital.

Authors:  E O V Ugwu; K C E Obioha; O A Okezie; A O Ugwu
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2011-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.