Literature DB >> 9096532

Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.

R A Rosenblatt1, S A Dobie, L G Hart, R Schneeweiss, D Gould, T R Raine, T J Benedetti, M J Pirani, E B Perrin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined differences among obstetricians, family physicians, and certified nurse-midwives in the patterns of obstetric care provided to low-risk patients.
METHODS: For a random sample of Washington State obstetrician-gynecologists, family physicians, and certified nurse-midwives, records of a random sample of their low-risk patients beginning care between September 1, 1988, and August 31, 1989, were abstracted.
RESULTS: Certified nurse-midwives were less likely to use continuous electronic fetal monitoring and had lower rates of labor induction or augmentation than physicians. Certified nurse-midwives also were less likely than physicians to use epidural anesthesia. The cesarean section rate for patients of certified nurse-midwives was 8.8% vs 13.6% for obstetricians and 15.1% for family physicians. Certified nurse-midwives used 12.2% fewer resources. There was little difference between the practice patterns of obstetricians and family physicians.
CONCLUSIONS: The low-risk patients of certified nurse-midwives in Washington State received fewer obstetrical interventions than similar patients cared for by obstetrician-gynecologists or family physicians. These differences are associated with lower cesarean section rates and less resource use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9096532      PMCID: PMC1381003          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.87.3.344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  56 in total

1.  Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.

Authors:  E B Keeler; M Brodie
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 2.  Midwifery care and out-of-hospital birth settings: how do they reduce unnecessary cesarean section births?

Authors:  C Sakala
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  The Mount Sinai cesarean section reduction program: an update after 6 years.

Authors:  S A Myers; N Gleicher
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Effect of changes in maternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rates.

Authors:  K M Parrish; V L Holt; T R Easterling; F A Connell; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  A comparison of labor and delivery management between nurse midwives and family physicians.

Authors:  W J Hueston; M Rudy
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  A comparison of family physicians' and obstetricians' intrapartum management of low-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  S E MacDonald; K Voaklander; R V Birtwhistle
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State.

Authors:  L McKenzie; P A Stephenson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Preparing and updating systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health care.

Authors:  I Chalmers; M Enkin; M J Keirse
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  The effect of health coverage for uninsured pregnant women on maternal health and the use of cesarean section.

Authors:  J S Haas; S Udvarhelyi; A M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  15 in total

1.  Problems in recruiting community-based physicians for health services research.

Authors:  S Asch; S E Connor; E G Hamilton; S A Fox
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Does delivery volume of family physicians predict maternal and newborn outcome?

Authors:  Michael C Klein; Andrea Spence; Janusz Kaczorowski; Ann Kelly; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The midwife as an "Instrument" of care.

Authors:  Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Mix of Maternity Care Providers in Canada.

Authors:  Harminder Guliani
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-08

5.  Accuracy of birth certificate and hospital discharge data: a certified nurse-midwife and physician comparison.

Authors:  Heather M Bradford; Vicky Cárdenas; Katherine Camacho-Carr; Mona T Lydon-Rochelle
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-02-06

6.  A hospital-based doula program and childbirth outcomes in an urban, multicultural setting.

Authors:  Julie Mottl-Santiago; Catherine Walker; Jean Ewan; Olivera Vragovic; Suzanne Winder; Phillip Stubblefield
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-07-03

7.  Characteristics of nurse-midwife patients and visits, 1991.

Authors:  L L Paine; J M Lang; D M Strobino; T R Johnson; J F DeJoseph; E R Declercq; D R Gagnon; A Scupholme; A Ross
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Low-Risk Deliveries: A Comparison of Midwives, Family Physicians and Obstetricians.

Authors:  Dylan Walters; Archna Gupta; Austin E Nam; Jennifer Lake; Frank Martino; Peter C Coyte
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-08

9.  Patient-level analysis of outcomes using structured labor and delivery data.

Authors:  Eric S Hall; Mollie R Poynton; Scott P Narus; Spencer S Jones; R Scott Evans; Michael W Varner; Sidney N Thornton
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  The practice of nurse-midwifery in the era of managed care: reports from the field.

Authors:  Lois McCloskey; Holly P Kennedy; Eugene R Declercq; Deanne R Williams
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.