Literature DB >> 2296123

Alternative strategies for controlling rising cesarean section rates.

R S Stafford1.   

Abstract

Cesarean section rates in the United States have increased from 5.5% in 1970 to 24.4% in 1987. This dramatic increase has generated considerable concern, leading to a variety of proposals to control rising use of cesarean section. Six strategies have been adopted or proposed to reduce cesarean section use: (1) education and peer evaluation, (2) external review, (3) public dissemination of cesarean section rates, (4) changes in physician payment, (5) changes in hospital payment, and (6) medical malpractice reform. These strategies differ in their specific assumptions regarding the process of clinical decision making, implications for physician autonomy, and methods of implementation. Educational efforts have been the most widely promoted. Of these, formal programs aimed at modifying practices within individual hospitals appear to be the most successful. However, insufficient research has been conducted to compare conclusively the impact and feasibility of these six strategies, pointing to the need for further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2296123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  13 in total

1.  Recent trends in cesarean section use in California.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-11

2.  Effects of patient, physician and hospital characteristics on the likelihood of vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in Quebec.

Authors:  G Goldman; R Pineault; H Bilodeau; R Blais
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Mode of delivery directs the phagocyte functions of infants for the first 6 months of life.

Authors:  M M Grönlund; J Nuutila; L Pelto; E M Lilius; E Isolauri; S Salminen; P Kero; O P Lehtonen
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Cesarean section and operative vaginal delivery in low-risk primiparous women, Western Australia.

Authors:  A W Read; W J Prendiville; V P Dawes; F J Stanley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  How Well Is Quality Improvement Described in the Perioperative Care Literature? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emma L Jones; Nicholas Lees; Graham Martin; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2016-05

6.  Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State.

Authors:  L McKenzie; P A Stephenson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; S A Dobie; L G Hart; R Schneeweiss; D Gould; T R Raine; T J Benedetti; M J Pirani; E B Perrin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Trends in obstetric operative procedures, 1980 to 1987.

Authors:  S C Zahniser; J S Kendrick; A L Franks; A F Saftlas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Mind the information gap: fertility rate and use of cesarean delivery and tocolytic hospitalizations in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ke-Zong M Ma; Edward C Norton; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2011-12-12

10.  Caesarean section rate and cost control effectiveness of case payment reform in the new cooperative medical scheme for delivery: evidence from Xi County, China.

Authors:  Shuang Liu; Jing Wang; Liang Zhang; Xiang Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.