Literature DB >> 12898090

Hitting moving targets: a dissociation between the use of the target's speed and direction of motion.

Anne-Marie Brouwer1, Tom Middelburg, Jeroen B J Smeets, Eli Brenner.   

Abstract

Previous work has indicated that people do not use their judgment of a target's speed to determine where to hit it. Instead, they use their judgment of the target's changing position and an expected speed (based on the speed of previous targets). In the present study we investigate whether people also ignore the target's apparent direction of motion, and use the target's changing position and an expected direction of motion instead. Subjects hit targets that moved in slightly different directions across a screen. Sometimes the targets disappeared after 150 ms, long before the subjects could reach the screen. This prevented subjects from using the target's changing position to adjust their movements, making it possible to evaluate whether subjects were relying on the perceived or an expected (average) direction to guide their movements. The background moved perpendicular to the average direction of motion in some trials. This influences the target's perceived direction of motion while leaving its perceived position unaffected. When the background was stationary, subjects hit disappearing targets along their trajectory, just as they hit ones that remained visible. Moving the background affected the direction in which subjects started to move their hand, in accordance with the illusory change in direction of target motion. If the target disappeared, this resulted in a hit that was systematically off the target's trajectory. If the target remained visible, subjects corrected their initial error. Presumably they did so on the basis of information about the target's changing position, because if the target disappeared they did not correct the error. We conclude that people do use the target's perceived direction of motion to determine where to hit it. Thus the perceived direction of motion is treated differently than the perceived speed. This suggests that the motion of an object is not broken down into speed components in different directions, but that speed and direction are perceived and used separately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12898090     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1556-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  Anisotropy in judging the absolute direction of motion.

Authors:  G Loffler; H S Orbach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Smooth eye movements and spatial localisation.

Authors:  E Brenner; J B Smeets; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Hitting moving objects: is target speed used in guiding the hand?

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Perceived motion in orientational afterimages: direction and speed.

Authors:  G Francis; H Kim
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Axis-of-motion affects direction discrimination, not speed discrimination.

Authors:  N Matthews; N Qian
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Modeling the time-dependent effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Scott Glover; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

7.  Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force.

Authors:  T L Hubbard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-09

8.  Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.

Authors:  D A Westwood; T McEachern; E A Roy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination.

Authors:  K Ball; R Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Object motion perception is shaped by the motor control mechanism of ocular pursuit.

Authors:  G Schweigart; T Mergner; G R Barnes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  24 in total

1.  Hitting moving targets: effects of target speed and dimensions on movement time.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of an orientation illusion on motor performance and motor imagery.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon; Umberto Castiello; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Synchronized firing among retinal ganglion cells signals motion reversal.

Authors:  Greg Schwartz; Sam Taylor; Clark Fisher; Rob Harris; Michael J Berry
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Adaptations of lateral hand movements to early and late visual occlusion in catching.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; C Lieke E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Models for the extrapolation of target motion for manual interception.

Authors:  John F Soechting; John Z Juveli; Hrishikesh M Rao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Control of interceptive actions is based on expectancy of time to target arrival.

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Extrapolation of vertical target motion through a brief visual occlusion.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Marco Iosa; Vincenzo Maffei; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Intercepting moving targets: does memory from practice in a specific condition of target displacement affect movement timing?

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Context effects on smooth pursuit and manual interception of a disappearing target.

Authors:  Philipp Kreyenmeier; Jolande Fooken; Miriam Spering
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.